nes Banned

DeRank ™: 19,86

DeAge™ : 6158 days • Here since 1 august 2009

R.E.M. New Adventures In Hi-Fi

24 nov 12

Voto:

never heard in my life. ready to bet I already know how 80% of the songs are made anyway. rax, satisfy my curiosity: are you the fake of one of the bosses and are you posting pseudo-famous stuff reviewed in a rush to give visibility to the site (Darius is like that, at least, I hope it’s like that), to make us laugh, or just because you’re a bit daft? Seriously, if you're not a fake, write less and pay a bit more attention to the form. If you are a wannabe comedian fake: you’re not funny, change sports. Seriously though, because they're all sadder than the last.

Sam Mendes Skyfall

23 nov 12

Voto:

Leaving aside the already tiresome discussion that there’s only one Bond and it’s Connery, it seems to me that this blessed Daniel Craig, who I neither like nor dislike and whose Bond films I have never seen, has all the right cards to be an excellent villain in the series but a terrible Bond. He completely lacks the elegant charm that has characterized all the 007s I've seen. I have no doubt that they are valid films, but I honestly can’t find the reasons that could have led to such a radical restyling of the character (at least in his "soul aesthetic"). Oh dear, perhaps Pierce Brosnan was a more than valid reason, actually. To return, however, to that tired discussion according to which the only Bond is the Scotsman, I think that an excellent replacement for him would have been Clark Gable (which, in fact, is like saying that the only Bond is Sean Connery). PS: after seeing 007 get married and have his wife killed 30 minutes after the ceremony, I believe there’s nothing left to distort in the "saga."

The Atomic Fireballs Torch This Place

21 nov 12

Voto:

The cover has a strong vibe of Doom (or Rough 2 since we're in 2012). All that's missing is some red splatter in the middle of the shirt.

Martin Scorsese Hugo Cabret

21 nov 12

Voto:

It's the movie that I've heard the worst about in recent years; not even Prometheus was described to me as being that pointless, and let's be honest, the review campaign against Prometheus was pretty significant everywhere. I haven't seen it just as I haven't read the review. However, if you give it a 4, I trust you, and I'll catch up on it. Worst case scenario, I just watched another crappy movie. I'll check back after I finish watching it, bye.

Röyksopp The Understanding

20 nov 12

Voto:

The album, upon first listen, I liked back then and I retrieved it. I was into Björk and múm, these were always cold lands and they convinced me. Then I listened to the CD more closely and I never put it back in the player again. Today I no longer have it, I probably traded it for a Guinness. The review: no offense, I've never had anything against duplicates, but this is the fifth one...

Throne Of Ahaz Nifelheim

19 nov 12

Voto:

I didn't get it, I certainly wouldn't understand the record.

AcephaliX Deathless Master

19 nov 12

Voto:

I read on deb that the 5s are given based on who wrote the reviews. True. A nickname like that demands a 5. As soon as I have time, I’ll read it, I swear. Actually no, I won’t read it: I’m a lover of zot. Slowly. If jurix is really the singer, I’ll give a 5 for the modesty. If jurix wasn’t the singer, I’ll give five to the album for its audacious modesty, and if jurix has never sung, I’ll give a 5 because, with all the love I have for jurix, it could have been worse. I’ll listen to it tomorrow.