sfascia carrozze

DeRank : 39,03
DeAge™ : 7563 days • Here since 25 september 2005
Drm Haiku
Drm Haiku
30 oct 05
Voto:
Dear De-commentator Mr. Lone Swordsman, in case you haven’t decided on a regular purchase (which I strongly recommend, to avoid misunderstandings..), you might alternatively try searching in the vast P2P circuit E-mule/Donkey-ano.
Dear De-commentator Mr. Vincolla, I believe I have used a plethora (perhaps decidedly too many...) of adjectives/descriptive phrases.. therefore I cordially invite you, to find the answers for which you pose your questions, to read the miserable review-breaker with more calmness and patience. Endless regards to both of you. Your S.C. of (distrust).
Lassigue Bendthaus Cloned
Voto:
Dear de-commentator Monsieur Giov, Thank you for the abundant (decidedly overestimated) praise for the humble wrecking mechanic: I must say that upon rereading the mephitic wrecking de-reviews, I completely agree with you... I will strive to better engage, in the future, in a less demeaning and more fluent verbal "work" of the tricolor language. Kind regards in abundance. Respectful greetings. Your S.C. of (s)confidence
Drm Haiku
Drm Haiku
30 oct 05
Voto:
Dear (..I mean it) Mr. De-Commentator Sfascia Ca**o, I remind you that you are NOT OBLIGED (nor do I believe the doctor prescribed it to you..) to read any de-reviews, especially those that do not please you. For next time, please do me a simple favor: when you see my miserable and wretched sfascia-suffix, feel free to jump over it; you will surely benefit from it (also, you won't have the chance to offend anyone, unnecessarily). Anyway, thank you very much for the remarkable de-comment. Best regards (also known as "until never again"). Your S.C. of (distrust).
Irfan Irfan
Irfan Irfan
29 oct 05
Voto:
Dear de-reviewer Monsieur Fred Abberline, just to say that I am greatly intrigued by your (albeit brief) de-commentary Irfan-esque: it even suggests housing poignant, out-of-space/time Lisa Gerrard-esque vocalities... Thank you very much for the Bulgarian-like/emotionally stirring de-reporting. Warmest regards. Your S.C. of (dis)trust.
The Anomoanon Asleep Many Years In The Wood
Voto:
Dear de-reviewer Mister JohnOfPatmos, I must say that (finally) I had the chance to listen to the work in question: a record of "simplicity" and disarming beauty. One of those (not so frequent) works that truly requires more than just careful listening to appreciate its substantial depth and vital freshness. (As always) praiseworthy de-signaling. Best regards. Your S.C. of (dis)trust.
Primal Scream Screamadelica
Voto:
...damn arteriosclerosis (also known as: and the votes?).
Primal Scream Screamadelica
Voto:
Notable de-review for a more than notable, surprising yet successful work. Thank you for the pleasant retrieval. Cordial regards. Your trusted S.C.
Prussian Blue Fragment of the Future
Voto:
Dear Mr. Maurizio, I thank you for your kind response. Indeed, I used three rather unpleasant suffixes (dictated by the "reactive" impulse in the face of theses that, in my humble opinion, were "hasty": Guevara vs Hitler), for which I sincerely apologize, albeit belatedly. First of all, I would like to say that the "disruptive" writing never advocated for censorship (an institution "for protection," as you teach me, that arose during the turbulent fascist period... therefore, in my view, unacceptable) of anyone or anything; thus, I will tell you that your underlying idea (NO censorship outright) is widely ethically shared by myself. In conclusion, I find any glorification of "any form of verbal (and otherwise) violence" totally unacceptable, regardless of which "side" it comes from and to which "side" it is directed. Regards. Whenever you wish. Your trusted S.C.
Metallica Kill 'Em All
Voto:
Really nice (..how outdated) times. Warm regards. Your S.C. of (dis)trust.
p.s.
remember the "ACCA" between T and subsequent R
Prussian Blue Fragment of the Future
Voto:
Dear Mr. Maurizio Testi, [I deliberately skip the gratuitous comments about myself, my subculture, and my alleged, very alleged, political attitude and/or faith (I also wonder how you can express yourself about me, knowing absolutely nothing about me.. oh well)], please forgive my insolent irreverence (mixed with abundant doses of malice) and foolish vacuity, but specifically referring to the de-reviewed album, what do you think? Leaving aside (...great Prince De Curtis) the different and nonetheless respectable historical/political divergences just mentioned, regarding the album and its essence (moreover easily defined as "commercialized"), do you agree or not? Please help me understand.. do you share it textually or musically? Thank you for the possible (and I hope cordial) reply. Best regards. Your S.C. of (distrust).