sfascia carrozze

DeRank ™: 39,03
DeAge™ : 7570 days • Here since 25 september 2005
Love Contact
Immolation Harnessig Ruin
Immolation Harnessig Ruin
27 jan 06
Voto:
Dear de-explainer Monsieur Cronos, just to thank you for the still generous courteous explanation clean/vocalisticam (of which -even though in broad terms- I already had a fair knowledge).. I would have listened to some clean/dirty vocal discrepancies myself (even though with greater frequency in the past). For the cordial Basettoni (ri-congratulations on the nickname..) I will reply with a phrase of certain Craven Road/relevance: No one had called me a wrecking ball. I could also swallow the toad, but I'm afraid it might be a prince under a spell [on mythopoetic license and, above all, signed: Groucho Marx]. Abundant regards to both as well as to todo el leggiucchiante debaseriano-pueblo. Your s.c. of (dis)trust.
Immolation Harnessig Ruin
Immolation Harnessig Ruin
27 jan 06
Voto:
Dear de-replicator/commentator Mr. Basettoni (kudos for the nickname..), you personally would find the dialectical wrecking ball quite disgusting indeed: you have every right to do so (who would deny you that), but we really don’t want to impose a sacred and unassailable de gustibus (just to avoid quoting the title of the esteemed and divine column from Cuore - I hope you are familiar with it - with its happy and chuckling title: AND WHO CARES). For the so-called stupid things (if you really don’t feel like re-reading your lofty de-comment), direct your gaze elsewhere, perhaps towards the phantasmic post mentioned above. Always and in any case, best regards. Your (not so much) s.c. of (dis)trust.
Immolation Harnessig Ruin
Immolation Harnessig Ruin
27 jan 06
Voto:
My cordial (it's quite a stretch to say so, of course) de-replicator Mister Anonymous as well as punctuated ghostly... if you really de-read (and tried to understand the possible underlying meaning) of my horrid de-comments perhaps (and I say perhaps... perhaps I overestimate it) you would notice that they are directed exactly along an obstinate and contrary path to what you (hastily) assert in your (ahem...) amiable de-legacy addressed to the wreck of writing. Personally, it is one of the sound typologies that I would prefer (when executed as Deus commands and when it especially contains innovative ideas and not always the same ones taken to extreme boredom...). Clear the de-concept? Nevertheless, cordial regards. Your s.c. of (s)trust. p.s. and in any case, I don’t think I’ve heavily offended anyone (as you do without any problem).
Riccardo Cocciante Cocciante
Riccardo Cocciante Cocciante
27 jan 06
Voto:
Dear Monsieur De-Cocciantoreo Marco Poletti, I did not know that the artist in question was Italo/Vietnamese (luckily you remind us of this not once but twice within a few lines..); regarding the record that has just been conveniently de-reviewed, in all honesty, it belongs almost entirely to the tender and youthful (pre)disastrous age and I have hardly any vivid or happy memories of it, but I always remember with pleasure the image of this infuriated screamer with long hair furiously thrown onto the keys of his piano. Thank you very much for the de-signaling. Cordial greetings. Your s.c. of (dis)trust.
Immolation Harnessig Ruin
Immolation Harnessig Ruin
27 jan 06
Voto:
Dear Monsieur de-recesnoreo Mister James ..ah well, if one lets oneself go to the clean vocals (when are those FRESH ones coming?) then it’s a completely different story. Playful regards in abundance, if not more. Your s.c. of (mis)trust. P.S. Of the reviewed group, I have only eavesdropped on the (horrible, de gustibus) debut L.P. and, frankly, I never dared to eavesdrop on them again (perhaps this is a masterpiece.. who can tell?) P.S.#2 You argue about the presented group as innovative/genius/semi-indispensabl e experimentally: very well. Would you kindly, at this point, explain this concept further (since at the same time you assert that it often recalls the morbid angels and specifically a band from about a decade ago)? If a group creates a progressive masterpiece (forgive me), cannot it heavily remind one of a reality (not exactly indispensable, de gustibus) from the previous decade: don’t you think? P.S.#3 Regards reiterated.
Gåte Jygri
Gåte Jygri
26 jan 06
Voto:
Dear de-sognatoreo/storiellatoreo Monsieur SurferKangaroo, while attempting to appreciate your dreamy/poetic descriptive endeavor, not knowing and regarding the de-reviewed (one could say) album/band, I would not have fully understood if within the mellifluous yet changing work in question there dwell potentially unpleasant sounds or not. Remerciements apprescindere for the de-segnalatzionem. Best regards, nonetheless cordial. Your s.c. di (s)fiduciam.
Anna Domino Anna Domino
Anna Domino Anna Domino
26 jan 06
Voto:
Dear Mr. Gabbox, the valuable and interesting de-review attention (as usual) given to the (apparently... a closed box) gracious (and blissfully unknown) Mademoiselle Anna Domino. Muchas gracias as well as much for the intriguing de-signaling. Respectful regards. Your esteemed and trusted.
Glenn Hughes Soul Mover
Glenn Hughes Soul Mover
26 jan 06
Voto:
De-reviewer action a little descriptively-covetous nevertheless (kind Mr. Mandrocker) for a voice ultra-soul and still impossibly magnificent as few are really heard in today’s soundless and asphyxiated musical landscape. Thank you anyway for the de-reporting. Best regards galore. Your s.c. of (s)trust.
Lagwagon Blaze
Lagwagon Blaze
26 jan 06
Voto:
Please forgive the para-linguistic digression: but (very) o(B)jective is not written with a single 'et unicam BI'? Or is it, in the eventuality, a grammatical strengthening operation? Best regards and playful jests in abundance. Your s.c. of (s)trust. P.S. It seems to me that there exists a certain underlying critical confusion within your de-reviewing actions nonetheless.
Asphyx Embrace The Death
Asphyx Embrace The Death
26 jan 06
Voto:
Dear de-replicator Monsieur Tepes, I truly don't believe I was overly critical (please reread more carefully if you have the patience and potential kindness... besides, I didn't give any rating) regarding you: no one (no Mr. Nobody relationship) has questioned whether you like these records or not, I was merely asking (in vain) for a greater and more precise critical awareness regarding works that perhaps (objectively) do not deserve all this imposing consideration; believe me, it is not merely an age-related issue: it is solely a matter of trying to look slightly (also) around and not to fossilize one's gaze/audit in a single mono-direction... this, clearly, will not prevent you from being able to evaluate (the currently rare) positive extremes of certain works of significant quality that have followed one another over time and that we have had the opportunity to appreciate repeatedly. That’s all. Paternalistic regards and playful jests in abundance. Your venerable s.c. of (dis)trust.
Similar users
Groups
zzo_guardi
wearetheradio
Editor
Electroma
Latino
Cactus
DeSarder
RadioDelirio
Grunged
DeDentro
FdL
Menzionator
Comindeb
BarNecchi
JukeBox
Isola
Fante
Championship
Posticcio
CasoUmano
Enigmatico
Tutausend
DeVoluminosi
DeBastards
Supercazzolaro
VecchiDeMmerda
CoverMuyBbrutas
Rewards
october 2005
week 40 - 2005
week 41 - 2005
week 3 - 2006
week 29 - 2006
week 12 - 2007
week 28 - 2007
week 29 - 2009
week 15 - 2010
week 9 - 2012
week 29 - 2013
week 18 - 2016
week 39 - 2017
week 1 - 2018
week 13 - 2018
Gran Visir -la recensione
week 16 - 2019
april 2019
week 27 - 2019
week 27 - 2021
week 32 - 2021
week 17 - 2023
week 33 - 2023
august 2023
week 43 - 2024
october 2024
week 16 - 2025
april 2025
week 28 - 2025
july 2025