puntiniCAZpuntini

And when you quote, dear my foolish prude, you copy and paste; you don't make silly interpretations. I have never written that phrase, nor have I written sentences that meant that, so feel free to offend me for days, my mom and my sister too if you want, but don’t put words in my mouth that I didn’t say, because you only show how poorly your little mind is reasoning. You didn't understand a damn thing about the whole discussion, and there are only 4 posts in total. If you have to read a book, how do you do it? Do you take notes page by page?

Oh, idiot, what the hell did you understand? Read carefully, jerk.

Alright with the acoustics, but it's just guitar, all guitar, an apotheosis of guitar; it has no groove, no bass, no tinkling sounds, no particular sounds that are practically always present in the albums you review. It's normal for JJ to make you feel like crap; give it a solid one, and you'll feel better.

No no, trust me, it’s the guitar.

Because it's all about guitar.

I hadn’t read Massimof’s reply. Dear Massimof, I wasn’t talking about CDs, and I already told you that; I was talking about you. I believe you said a huge mistake when you said, “It’s not credible that records known by very few are praised while successful records are beautifully dragged through the mud. It’s neither a just nor a mature attitude. Of course, tastes are tastes. But on this site, it seems that whenever a successful CD is reviewed, one gets buried under tons of crap. Does being ‘in’ mean you have to praise the ‘outs’?” I’m not pretending not to understand; I understood perfectly well what you meant, but I’m not talking about CDs. I’m talking about you, who said something foolish. So I don’t need to change my slang anywhere; I’ll leave it where it is, and I repeat: spare us this crap, please. It’s perfectly credible that unknown groups are liked a lot; it’s not at all true that praising the ‘outs’ makes you ‘in’, and it’s not at all true that if someone sells, we throw crap over them. So don’t say foolish things. You’re the one pretending not to understand; you understood perfectly well that I was talking to you and not to Ligabue, whom I don’t even know, luckily. Spare us this crap, listen to your crappy music, and that’s fine with me, but don’t come saying that we’re the “strange” ones because here, the only fool who listens to Ligabue is you. You’re the strange one; you’re the one who spouts nonsense; you’re the ignorant one, and you’re also a real stickler. For what it’s worth, I consider you a dumbass, and I’m telling you.

I understood that Trouble you say, I was confusing a few hundred names, Trouble is just one and they're quite famous (in the scene). I only have Psalm9 from them, quite classic like Doom, beautiful beautiful fantastic but I don't like classic Doom as much as the trippy one, pissi pissi loves you all.

Trouble... which ones? There are some Trouble with Joe Preston in the mix, the bassist of High On Fire, Matt Pike's band, who was the former guitarist of Sleep. I haven't heard about any rivalries, but I know very little about Preston's Trouble, and there are quite a few bands called Trouble or similar, so I’m probably mistaken. Ah, also get Lysol and BullHead by the Melvins, two more albums (besides those of the bands I've mentioned) that Pelican have listened to millions and millions of times, especially Lysol. Oh, similar to Pelican is also Catharsis by Yob. As soon as I have it in my hands, I'll let you know what I think about these.

So come on Moon... sing with me: IZZ MAAAIII LAAIIFFF... IZZ NAU OR NEVER... AI DON UONNA LIVVVV FOREEVEERRR... IZZ!MY!LAIF!

Booorrrnn... tùùùbìììì... uuuuaaa---aaaaiilddd...