puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 7979 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Aerosmith Pump
16 feb 04
Voto:
Come on, Tano, I gave it a 3.5 and you gave it a 4, it's not that bad. If only there were more albums like this, and that in the drug period they were definitely better. It might be bad for the brain, but in 90% of cases, it benefits the guitars. They need to find one that contains lots of active ingredients: phosphorus, potassium, omega-3s. Then we'd really see some great albums coming out.
Voto:
I've also experienced music with my pupils, but come on, you're not telling us everything. But does your mom know what you do at concerts? :))
Voto:
They are good. The album is really nice but not a 5/5.
Voto:
Damn, I didn't know that... nice heads up.
Aerosmith Pump
16 feb 04
Voto:
Not even remotely comparable to Toys In the Attic. At the time, everyone would call them Toxic Twins here, junkies there, but in the meantime, they were smashing it. I would say this is a 3.5. You can tell they are old, tired, and washed up.
Voto:
It depends on which album of Blue Cheer you mean.
Voto:
added the Double "One Teach One" (€16 is a real bargain) to the February cart... long live the death grind core brutal metal of 4/5...
Voto:
That is, all 4. whether you liked them very little or not at all, whether they have creativity or not, whether they are live or studio, all 4. by now we won’t give them a rating anymore, because we already know.
Mudvayne L.D.50
16 feb 04
Voto:
I mean, all 4. whether you liked them very little or not at all, whether they have creativity or not, whether they are live or studio, all 4.
Voto:
I mean, all 4. whether you liked them very little or not at all, whether they have creativity or not, whether they're live or studio, all 4.