nes Banned

In the half hour that it's been out, no one has commented on it yet because: "Is he joking or is he serious?" I got it. Right? Right that you're joking? No, because: there could definitely be another Bond film, but if I want to see Bond... I want to see Bond, not another Bond. Bond getting married? That's wrong. Bond getting his wife killed? That's wrong. Bond that... credits roll after the wife’s murder??? Oh??? Where the hell is James Bond? You want to sell me on: this is another Bond? Okay, I'll respond: yes, thanks for nothing, this is an idiot!
Forget it, I only saw this film when I was 12, in August, just after I arrived on vacation in the Marche region. We arrived late in the evening, and after dinner, we sat down in front of the TV and there was the scene on the skis (I remember the huge issues with the green screen, even 23 years later), so I only saw a bit of it, a lifetime ago, as a semi-teenager. But I remember something: I remember ugly scenes and the satisfaction with which I finally grasped the most intrinsic and visceral concept of the term "boiata."
Maybe you're not joking, maybe you're serious, the film deserves it and I should rewatch it, but in my memories, this film stays high up in the Olympus of crap, where it defends itself with an excellent reputation. I would hate to have to downgrade it to a pointless little flick or worse, but yes, a somewhat passable thing.
The top spot in the rankings, however, is a joke, and if it’s not a joke, take a break because Bond is hurting you (and I told you, by the way, that in my opinion, you were trying to hurt yourself). But it’s definitely a joke. Right? Come on, I’ve already got the phone in my hand ready to call 118: was it a joke or not?

and it's written TI... dear Tarantino...

Ah, sorry, I have an important thing to say: after watching it, I downloaded it and A: the online version sounds terrible and looks worse (655mb) so if you think about downloading it instead of going to the cinema, know that you’ll be watching an awful movie. Secondly, on a 16/9, the Panavision uses just over half the height of the screen. Therefore: do you want to wait for the Blu-ray? Okay, it will look like this (but in HD, let’s not exaggerate...) panavision Pictures, panavision Images, panavision Photos, panavision Videos - Image - TinyPic - Servizio di hosting d'immagini, condivisione immagini & hosting di video gratuito obviously if instead of a 16/9 you have a letterbox TV that’s fine. But if you have a letterbox TV, you really have money to flush down the toilet, so just go to the cinema even if you need a plane to reach the nearest one!

I’m fed up with reading and talking about Tarantino. The three little balls seem crazy to me. For sure, Tarantino is going back to the Dogs. I liked Tim Roth playing the part of Christopher Waltz, and as Tarantino knows well: no one takes a bullet in the abdomen like Tim Roth does.
But I would have preferred to see Christopher Waltz, so maybe he wouldn’t have had time to shoot Spectre. That would have been a good thing, but Bartle will tell you about that in due time.
With all the other things buzzing in my head about this movie, I could fill four reviews, but honestly, I’m fed up: do you like the film? Good. Don’t you like the film? Tough luck.
About the Panavision discussion: the film is in Panavision across the entire peninsula, for sure even under your house in Casalpusterlengo. The difference between the two versions is that one is on film (the longer one) and the other is digital.
In the review of The Thing (shot in 70 millimeters/difficult transfer/photography problems), it's not mentioned, and so, excuse me, it lacks the central part of the entire operation: we talk about "The Hateful Eight" but it's better this way: enough talking about Tarantino.
The only sensible thing to say about Tarantino, I think, is this: when his film comes out, it’s the best film in theaters at that moment. Always: eight films in his career, eight times it’s been like this. They may not be masterpieces (think whatever you want and get off in front of Wes Anderson), but it outshines every possible alternative.

perfect review, interesting mention, five-star album. Not that I've listened to it in full, but the first track is stunning, and the whole album is free.

"Thunderball" is essentially the underwater level of a platform video game like Super Mario Bros or Sonic." What the hell are we even writing for?

discone.

I stopped here: "Quentin returns to pure genre filmmaking." Returns??? Has he ever done anything else?

Is it a form of outing?

When you think of James Bond, you think of Goldfinger. It's quite funny how out of all the 007s, there isn't a single one whose plot I remember in full, but yes: when I think of James Bond, I think of the golden corpse, the tip of the miracle blade, the tuxedo under the wetsuit; there's not much to be done.