nes Banned

not satisfied, you bring Malmsteen into a comment... Harlan, you're a nice guy, good and I imagine also very clean, but be careful because if you keep this up, you'll get banned here. Drop the power and embrace the pubic hair of doom. Enough with the wanking, damn it!

The five in the dark is because you managed to hit the nail on the head on the second line (and I'm saying this without having seen the movie because I'm too ahead).

"The truth is that unfortunately people look at Eastwood with obvious irritating political biases. That's why American Sniper has been (and still is!) pointed out as a fascist-reactionary-war-mongering film." Applause for lobotomy (who deserves it this time) and shame on you.
I haven't seen the film, but I've heard about it at length from people I trust and wanted to see if anyone could bring up American Sniper showing that they understood something beyond the simple images. So I read just the beginning, and right there it already appears; once I've seen it, I'll go back and read you. Still, good job to lobotomy; a bit more argumentation wouldn't hurt, but maybe it's not there because it's in the review and it wouldn't make sense to reiterate, I'll find out.
Then, since I haven't read anything, I'll take the liberty to (perhaps) reiterate the concepts expressed in the review. This sniper starts from news facts that have had an enormous media impact in America. It's a film that doesn't explain an event because the event is already well-established for the American audience. And American Sniper is clearly a film made for Americans, to the point that the rest of the planet, or almost, didn't understand a damn thing... The sniper first shows the soldier as the ultimate hero, very true, but it's a hero killed by another soldier. American. And at this point, if you were Americans, you should ask yourselves some questions. Even if you're not American, you might try to ask yourself; the final scene (the closing titles of the funeral) would have a completely different flavor from what you have left in your mouth. (I take the liberty of addressing YOU because everywhere I've heard "oh and the ultra-American finale with the big flags and the big music, come on, if that's not an ultra-patriotic warmonger!!!" but here for now (I've only read 2 comments) it seems like being among people not entirely lobotomized (beyond the usernames). Then of course, he is definitely a patriot, just as he surely has something to say about the direction his country has decided to take.
Point, end. It is as it is; if you don't trust it, that's your problem, you definitely have bigger issues to overcome than understanding a film that wasn't made for you.

Funny, more G War than any other group.

who the hell thinks that Slipknot plays death metal, Cristina D'Avena?

I think there’s a fly buzzing around.

I haven't heard it yet, but Rome is a certainty musically at this time.

Sorry, I didn't understand: is Mrg Mauro a fake of Luludia? If so: Luludia, what the hell happened to you? I agree with 99% of what you say, but you say it so many times and with such a quantity of words that it sounds like a joke. Two paragraphs would have sufficed, maybe one.
Also, despite the topic not being new and being eons away from the review environment, I still find it central to what happens within a site like this, and I wanted to share my personal experience by rambling numbers and data that could substantiate the arguments made in the writing.
The world hasn’t always had MP3s, and back then I spent about 80,000 lire a month on CDs (one a week), in four years I had accumulated over 200 titles.
Currently, I have 480 gigabytes of music (over 7,000 folders, over 55,000 files).
When I was working ad minchiam, I only bought at concerts. For a concert, I would go out with 100 euros (the average price of a concert I attend is 15 euros, the remaining 85 euros went to CDs, vinyls, t-shirts. Occasionally I would come home with 20 euros in change, but not always).
And, on average, I went to one concert every two months.
Today I have a stable and well-paying job, I continue to download like crazy, and I spend an average of 150 euros a month on music from Amazon, plus concerts (when I can) which I still attend with 100 euros.
Now, if you want we can keep saying that downloading takes money away from music, but I would be happier if we acknowledged how things really are: when I wasn’t downloading, I was giving 40 euros a month to music; now that I download, I contribute six times that amount.
I didn’t buy Madonna's records before, just as I don’t buy them now; the records I "steal" in MP3 now I was stealing with TDK before.
I imagine I can’t be taken as an example for everyone, but, well, I spend and listen to enough music to assure that downloading has also done a lot of good for the music industry. And I’m only talking about the economic side of the issue; for everything else, it’s certainly not necessary for someone to tell me that the increase in visibility of an artistic work benefits both the work itself and its creator.

@[G]: add a new section like "free writings" where everyone writes whatever the hell they want?