nes Banned

And with this panic, I bid you farewell.

Proudly, I can agree with you too... do you read post-hardcore apocalyptic in the review? I don’t. And as soon as I read post-hardcore, I thought of Fugazi... then I read post-metal and thought: what the fuck!

"I'm doing this with you because you really get on my nerves, and honestly, I don't see any utility in your presence in the community. In short, you belong to those who write a few reviews not to discuss music, not to make interesting observations, but just to go around breaking balls on all reviews without anyone saying, 'but you’ve never reviewed anything, you can’t talk.' It seems to me that my comment on this review was a musical clarification, you know? Look, I'll try to rephrase it for you... 'I won't vote to avoid another pointless discussion, but the fact that at first Neurosis played hardcore and then post-metal doesn't make post-hardcore and post-metal the same genre. Moreover, as you say, post-metal is a genre that develops in the 00s, but post-hardcore was born in the 80s. Fugazi is perhaps the best post-hardcore band in the world, they formed in '87 if I remember correctly, and they have very little in common with post-metal. As for how you label this record, whether post-hardcore, post-metal, or whatever, I ignore because I've never heard it. I'll try to start from the beginning.' Yes, yes, we're talking about music here, my dear... You're the one who always wants to drag discussions into the personal, with pathetic provocative phrases: 'You know what another fact is,' insulting my family, threatening me (and you have the nerve to say I should stay away from you???). This is a game you started, and I'm sorry it makes you so upset... Giving a 1 to my person? And you think I give a damn about your opinion, forgive me? 'Stay away from my pages and I will stay away from you' (then why from me and not from my pages? That's another threat?). My dear, I told you this some time ago, and you didn’t care... why should I do the same? Moreover, I don't come here to provoke you; I come here to talk about music as I have already shown you; you're the one who changes the subject because you have nothing else to say. One last annoying clarification: 'teenagelobotomy, listen to a ton of records that aren’t hard rock before you make such a judgment. Nonsense? Are you sure? Did you read Tarpit's comment? Maybe it's you who completely ignores the existence of the sound I’m talking about.' Yes, maybe teenage ignores it, but it's your fault for throwing post-hardcore (attributing its birth to the 00s!!!!) and post-metal into the same pot... Ah, right! And also 'atmosferisagi.' Then Tarpit can understand what you’re talking about by reading the whole paragraph, and no one is saying anything to you about this, but what you write in the first two lines doesn't make much sense. The next kid who reads this review and has never heard anything by Neurosis will think they play the same genre as Fugazi and vice versa. It seems to me, therefore, that commenting on the review by saying that post-hardcore and post-metal are two different things is useful for anyone who uses this site, especially newcomers to the genres."

pewao= taken...

Now make a joke about that "proptrarre," to change the subject again.

Panic, you don't want to deceive people. You do it with me to prolong this conversation indefinitely. You've already admitted it on this page: "http://debaser.it/recensionidb/ID_31238/Pino_Daniele_Bella_Mbriana.htm" in comment 47: "I merely prolong your regurgitations onto Debaser in such a way as to convince someone to ban you." I repeat, "In such a way as to convince someone to ban you..." What a great impression!

I've never heard this album; after I listened to "Paper Monster," I promised myself to avoid the solo works of the good Gahan... yesterday you published a review on Depeche, today on Gahan. I would recommend you also listen to "Counterfeit 2" by Gore.

Without ifs and buts.

@Tarapit: you are perfectly right, what I am trying in vain to explain to panico is that post-hardcore is not a genre that was born in the 2000s and it is not the same thing as post-metal: "It's called Post-Hardcore, or Atmospheric Sludge, or Post-Metal, whatever name you want to give it, it remains an innovation of the 2000s." (first two lines of the review) your comment only serves to reinforce my thesis. when I say that Fugazi invented post-hardcore, I am indeed mistaken. but I say it in response to yet another idiotic comment from panico, aimed solely at discrediting the interlocutor: "And don't come to my page saying that Fugazi invented post-hardcore just because you read it on Ondarock." in fact, I simply stated that Fugazi is a post-hardcore band and they were formed in '87 (if I remember correctly): comment 11: "Moreover, as you say, post-metal is a genre that develops in the 2000s, but post-hardcore originated in the '80s. Fugazi is perhaps the best post-hardcore band in the world, formed in '87 if I remember correctly, and have very little to do with post-metal." comment 15: "But it's a fact that Fugazi were post-hardcore, that post-metal and post-hardcore are not the same thing is another fact, and that Neurosis do post-metal and not post-hardcore is finally another fact." Then panico brings up that thing that they didn't invent it and misleads me. But the underlying problem is the same: "It's called Post-Hardcore, or Atmospheric Sludge, or Post-Metal, whatever name you want to give it, it remains an innovation of the 2000s." this statement is incorrect. (let's also overlook panico's attitude in defending his thesis, which, by the way, you Tarapit have just dismantled)

Since when have you been part of the opposition?