nes Banned

DeRank ™: 19,86

DeAge™ : 6161 days • Here since 1 august 2009

Metallica Master Of Puppets

5 jun 10

Voto:

Sure, Bartle can be closed here to avoid going on until tomorrow; in fact, considering the usefulness of your last comment, it could have already been closed two comments ago.

Metallica Master Of Puppets

5 jun 10

Voto:

belly or panic villa if you prefer.

Metallica Master Of Puppets

5 jun 10

Voto:

Pancio, your supportive comments about Bartle are the best thing that could have happened on this page (I didn't think Bartle needed someone like you).

@Chaos: no, the editors don't publish everything. If they think a review says too little about an album, for example, they won't publish it. I wonder: can't they equally exclude the twentieth review of the same album, perhaps notifying the author by saying that in order to avoid wasting a review in casapagina when there are already several revisions available, and that the comments on the review would only consist of insults, they preferred not to include it in the list of publishable reviews? Now Bartle will probably get angry again (in fact, now that I've hypothesized this, he's probably laughing about it, but whatever) and will repeat to me to go look for the answer on the site, all seasoned with some childish insults to which I won't be allowed to respond because his, he claims, are invitations and not insults...), but honestly, I have no intention of flipping through the site page by page, and I remain convinced that such a thing could certainly be done. Editors could definitely avoid making idiotic comments on these reviews; everyone else is obviously allowed to post them instead. I'll close by saying that you're absolutely right, there's no need to insult each other for such a reason, but I should point out that I posted a question and the response was "kiss my ass, sift through the site, you're worse than a review of Pink Floyd." (Bartle, I repeat, chamomile...) From that, it seemed fair to me to respond, but I didn't come here with "bellicose" intentions; I just asked a question. As for the issue of what happens if you annoy the editors, the problem wouldn't arise: it already works that if you get on an editor's nerves, you get banned.

Metallica Master Of Puppets

5 jun 10

Voto:

But of course, Bartle, I will also go looking for one of those phantom twenty million answers (you're a very useful editor, by the way; someone asks you a question and you respond, "look around," damn, even the punny can do that), but in response to the invitation "kiss my ass," I say you can ask your mother about it, because yes, yours is a middle school invitation and deserves an appropriate response. Vaya con Dios. (P.S.: I didn't look up Oedipal sex on Wikipedia, but if you’re missing the meaning, I believe that the aforementioned pseudo-encyclopedia, under "Oedipus" or "Oedipus Rex," will clarify your ideas.)

Metallica Master Of Puppets

5 jun 10

Voto:

and if your comment wasn't an insult, I apologize for the loser part, which was indeed an insult, so for that, honestly, I'm sorry.

Metallica Master Of Puppets

5 jun 10

Voto:

I don’t understand what you gain by continuing, anyway, mine was an invitation: since no one invited you anywhere before, try inviting someone you care about to do what you like. I have nothing against those who practice Oedipal sex, maybe your mother has an issue with it, or you, I don’t know, but mine was just an invitation too.

Metallica Master Of Puppets

5 jun 10

Voto:

"@Nes: kiss my ass. And after you kiss my ass, go read the two hundred fifty thousand billion answers that I/we have given to the same question over the last 15 years. Damn, you're worse than a review of The Dark Side of The Moon...//Uncle Wolf, I made a mistake: of course it was 'that I/we have given to the same question', damn sweetener... the sweetener in the coffee??? You might want to drink chamomile.
My dear, you can bounce the kiss my ass to your mother, I didn't insult you, loser."

Metallica Master Of Puppets

5 jun 10

Voto:

I don’t understand: first the editors decide whether or not to publish a review, then they move on to throwing stones at the one who wrote the review. Wouldn’t it be easier to just not publish them?