nes Banned

DeRank ™: 19,86

DeAge™ : 6161 days • Here since 1 august 2009

Christopher Nolan Inception

30 sep 10

Voto:

I don’t know, the movie didn’t convince me at all: too much stuff doesn’t add up. But in the end, can you come out of limbo sane and sound or not? And if so, how? And above all: if everything had been in its place in the plot, if all doubts were cleared up, wouldn’t it still be a bad copy of The Matrix?
And the child architect? What the hell role does she have? She doesn’t build anything; the only thing she’s there for is to have DiCaprio explain in minute detail how the dream world works (which, by the way, works one way in theory and another way in practice, which we’re still not told). No, this doesn’t work for me. If I had stumbled upon it by chance, I would have thought of it as a nice little movie with no pretensions, but with all the advertising it received, I can’t help but think it’s one of the biggest cinematic disappointments of the year.

My Chemical Romance The Black Parade is Dead!

30 sep 10

Voto:

Yes, well that stuff that my high school classmate called emocore... I have no idea if it can actually be classified as "emo"...

My Chemical Romance The Black Parade is Dead!

30 sep 10

Voto:

"The problem is that labels ruin groups and that 'EMo'.... against the first phase of emo punk, I have nothing against it... MinuteInbox | 10 Minute Mail Service

My Chemical Romance The Black Parade is Dead!

30 sep 10

Voto:

what you call "a hell of a group"...

Jarboe The Men Album

30 sep 10

Voto:

the vote was missing...

Jarboe The Men Album

30 sep 10

Voto:

I don't like Swans, I have her album with Neurosis, that doesn't excite me either, but I've heard some nice tracks of hers on YouTube, maybe I'll try Anhedoniac.

Carlos Santana All That I Am

29 sep 10

Voto:

No, you said that sentence is correct, albeit convoluted... that sentence is not convoluted and is incorrect; the convoluted and correct sentence is this: "Nik's imbecility is directly proportional to the quantity of obscene (or terrible, or poor) qualities present in this album...." You didn't write it; you wrote this: "His imbecility is directly proportional to the quality of this album!" Those are two different phrases with opposite meanings, and as someone has already pointed out to you, it's clear to everyone that you meant to say: "Nik's intelligence is directly proportional to the qualities of the album." But you didn't do it, and you came up with this diatribe that lasted 3 days, 80 comments, 6 users who participated, to arrive at what? To tell me I am right when in comment 171 I do nothing but repeat things that Nik told you 70 comments earlier... Listen, before calling me an idiot, before calling me a fool, before thinking you are somehow superior to me, learn to write. Everything will become easier for you.

Carlos Santana All That I Am

29 sep 10

Voto:

"Ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.... you got there...." sorry ... ... no... ... seriously ... ... "look, where I’ve gotten to (even though it would be more accurate to say, where I made you open your eyes) ... I don’t know how to tell you... ... anyway, yes ... comment 171 that you support, well, it claims that the sentence you quoted days ago is incorrect, exactly as nik pointed out to you days ago, as paola pointed out to you, as cappio pointed out to you, as fede pointed out to you, as I pointed out to you earlier... in short... I would take it easy with the "you got there"... anyway, happy for you...

Carlos Santana All That I Am

29 sep 10

Voto:

"Not only that, you misunderstood the proportional relationship... if you assign a positive value to quality, the relationship becomes: the record has low quality, the user is not very foolish (this because it’s a direct proportionality)! Exactly the opposite! GREAT! WELL DONE! ENCORE!" No, I never said that, but go on, keep talking to yourself, make up rules that don’t exist, quote dictionaries, pull out Cartesian planes... Damn, were you built that way or did you just turn out like this by mistake?

Carlos Santana All That I Am

29 sep 10

Voto:

No, because when you say that by quality you mean poor, it seems you're indicating that the qualities of the album are low and therefore the sentence would be incorrect. If, however, you meant the phrase I reported to you... well, that’s not what you wrote, and no sane person would have read it that way. For a simple reason: "your stupidity is directly proportional to the (poor) quality of this album." This sentence means one thing; "the imbecility (of Nik) is directly proportional to the amount of terrible (or poor, or substandard) qualities present in this album..." this is the exact opposite... I mean, we’re still at the same point: it was clear to everyone what you wanted to say, but you said the exact opposite... we’re a bit too many to think that, you know? But who cares anyway. Ps: you’re right, though.