nes Banned

DeRank : 19,86
DeAge™ : 6157 days • Here since 1 august 2009
Vermin Womb Decline
Voto:
Stefania come back, Miki is a sweet and tender treasure. Don't make him suffer, Stefania, come back. The Giønson concert is waiting for you.
Novi Se mi copri rollo al volo
Voto:
Sphissero?
Madrugada Madrugada
Voto:
I wanted to see if this record was in the review database because I wanted to look cool and propose an amazing album. Instead, you already know it. So I’m leaving this comment in the hope that someone reads it on the homepage and, intrigued, comes to see what it's about, reads the review, and listens to the album. Which is beautiful. Really beautiful. And, damn, it’s neither psychedelic nor doom nor electronic; I mean, if I say it’s beautiful, it’s either because it’s true or because I don’t know shit about music. Which is also true, but then all the comments above confirm that. Or almost.
Ps: Up above there’s a comment mentioning Nick Cave, and since I’m here I’ll give my two cents: first, Nicola, these guys and those with Nicola aren’t exactly identical, second, these guys have a singer with an amazing voice, Nick has a tremendous charisma, a great voice, but his singing often reminds me of someone who would rather recite than sing. In short, music does require charisma, but also sounds, and Nick takes a lot of spins compared to these bold ex-youngsters Madrugada.
The most beautiful thing to conclude is that those snubbing this album in favor of Industrial Silence are almost right: they’re wrong when they label the album as not excellent, but they’re definitely right to say that there are better works of theirs. So: Madrugada? It’s something to cry on your knees while cutting your arms.
Primus The Desaturating Seven
Voto:
But what do the rancho relaxo have to do with him? I could check online before writing to you, but at that point, I wouldn't know what else to say other than "good job, but if you are both Almo, who is?"
Mercyful Fate In the Shadows
Voto:
Sorry but... Black Metal???
Steve Rogers Band I duri non ballano
Voto:
I just listened to "lift up your skirt"; I've been saying this for ages: TV themes vs music in the '80s: winning hands down with seven years under my belt and a tricycle in my backpack.

To give substance to the message above, I’ll link a track that has nothing to do with what I was listening to before, and that’s more than intentional.
Ayreon The Source
Voto:
How can one not have pretensions and dedicate oneself to a genre called "Progressive Metal Operistico"? The name of the genre is pompous even by itself... I don’t know them, but calling one of the most off-key metal singers I’ve ever had the pleasure of hearing live doesn’t seem like a particularly smart choice.
Andrea Pazienza Zanardi
Voto:
Zanardi is neither a calculator nor a rebel, and he is certainly not "forced to be bad." Zanardi is bad; Zanardi is, by definition of the same Paz, evil. And as such, it's impossible to confront him as a human character. Everything he does is over the top, exaggerated, absurd. From the wolves episode to Cinderella, passing through all the others more or less.
He is the most famous character of Pazienza, his coolest and youngest comic; much of what is meant by "Pazienza style" is within these pages. The review says very little and not very well, tackling what is a foundational and cultural cornerstone for who knows how many people on the site. Perhaps reviewing the Divine Comedy was easier.
Maybe we should leave Pazienza where he is.
Loop A Gilded Eternity
Voto:
Recently discovered. They seemed very valid to me, but I've listened to so much stuff like this by now that I didn't dwell on it too much. Ten years ago, I would have worshipped them.
The Beatles The Beatles
Voto:
But in 2017, are we still talking about the Beatles? Discussing them as if they were a record released yesterday, and therefore saying what is good about them today and what seems superfluous (TODAY)... And as if that weren’t enough with the at least out-of-focus approach, it’s developed track by track?
I understand that this site is approached with the spirit of "I want to share my thoughts on..." but it would be nice if, before sharing, people at least reflected on how they express their opinions. I'm not saying to ponder the meaning of the message being conveyed: debaser is all about fun, and it's fine to read a review that claims Mercury was out of tune and that Led Zeppelin were irrelevant because they copied others. Each reader will form their own opinion on how useful or interesting it is to follow one user over another; but at least taking two minutes to consider how to make what you're proposing appealing wouldn’t hurt.
We write for ourselves, but we are also read by others. This is a beautiful thing, but it risks becoming a double-edged sword with only one sharp edge pointed at the "authors."
I apologize for the term "authors," which seems out of place for each of us, but I couldn't think of a better one.