nes Banned

Look, panz, whether my opinion is fried or boiled air for you, I don’t care. I've already answered your questions, but you’re free to ask them as many times as you want; it would be hilarious (finally!)

More than anything else, you had asked me before why I wasn't leaving, which isn't exactly the same thing. If you had told me earlier: "if it were up to me, I would have already booked you a charter flight," I would have immediately told you that I didn't give a damn about what you would do; and everything would have ended much sooner. Instead, you kept asking questions, one more idiotic than the last, and putting words in my mouth that I never said for three days.

I didn't throw a damn thing, panz... I expressed my opinion. "What can I do, if it were up to me, with Calderoli and Borghezio we’d be making hamburgers to feed the immigrants in Lampedusa." Try reading that "if it were up to me" part again; there are no conditions, it doesn't say that I love Muslims... it doesn't say a damn thing about what you tried to put in my mouth. Do I make you laugh? Judging by the bold comments, I’d say that more than laughing, your bile is rising, and the funniest thing is that you did it all by yourself. Laugh, laugh, panz, but in a playlist, please, so we can all laugh together.

"YOU CAN'T DICTATE CONDITIONS! I’ve been telling you this for three days." Sorry, but are you serious or are you just pretending??? I have never dictated conditions, and I’ve been trying to repeat that for three days. As for the "what does shameful mean, explain it," I believe you have a dictionary at home (oh dear, I’m not so sure, I really wouldn’t be surprised if that’s not the case). Now please go back to the playlist, that’s where you’re funnier.

No panz, the only thing you asked me is: "if you love the Muslims, why don't you go to Iran instead of staying here scratching your ass for no reason." (post 64, since memory seems to deceive you) and I already replied, "I don't go there because I never said I love Muslims... Besides being a fool, are you also delusional now? Please tell me where I said I love Muslims. I'm curious to know where you got this from, I'm curious to understand how the little nut navigates in your skull." After that you asked me: "and answer if we are obliged to live with people like you who set conditions (too)" and I already replied (twice), "What conditions have I set?" ... But why am I still here giving you attention? The all caps message isn't a little pathetic? I'm talking about the all caps, not the delirium it contains.

"Are you stupid by nature or are you drunk again today?" What does "stupid by nature" mean? What's the difference between stupid and stupid by nature? Explain this to me when you have 2 minutes. And no, I'm not drunk. The fact that I'm not drunk and I'm here discussing with you makes me more than just stupid; I'd say I'm a fool, I'll admit it.

Am I making a mess??? Where did I say that I love Muslims, where did I extol immigration? Where did I say that Italians are happy with immigration? Now, either you answer these questions (since these are things you inexplicably claim) or goodbye. It’s not possible to be here talking with someone who doesn’t understand a damn thing (and I mean a damn thing, you've managed to misinterpret almost every single one of my comments) and be told that I’m making a mess. My dear, if you want to continue the discussion, come up with a plausible response; otherwise, the playlist is there waiting for you. And don’t come tell me that in post 72 you'll explain it to me because the only thing you do is tell me: "No to Muslims, etc., etc..." It’s a phrase you extracted to imply that this isn’t right, I think, and there’s not half a response to the questions I asked you... Then you know, questions, I’m just asking you to justify your statements (something you clearly are not able to do). You close the last post with "let's move on by answering what I’m asking you." But are you acting like an idiot or do you really have psychiatric issues? What the hell should I respond to you if you haven’t asked me anything?

I almost forgot: "we are forced to live with people like you who lay down the law." What conditions would I have laid down?

"No to the Muslims, etc. etc. etc." Dear Panz, let's say things as they are, the phrase was: "NO TO THE MUSLIMS WHO ARE A PAIN IN THE ASS IN SCHOOLS"... and the fact that I find it disgraceful for a politician to express himself like that doesn't mean that I love Muslims... seriously, it doesn't mean that, I don't know how you can interpret it that way. The rest of the message is comical: calm down and write in Italian please, I can understand typos (I'm the king of those) but the only thing that can be understood up there is that: "THE LEAGUE IN ITS TERRITORY CAN SAY AND DO WHAT IT DEEMS BEST FOR THE CITIZENS WHO VOTED FOR IT." But what is its territory??? Padania? Padania doesn't exist. Italy? The League thinks Italy is disgusting... so you see, no matter how you look at it, the League doesn't even have the right to exist. (But it won the elections... No, it didn't win the elections, it kissed Silvio's ass to be where it is now and by the way, it's at 11% right now; if you think 11% is the majority, then you have problems even in elementary math.) And then you continue not to respond: where did I say that I love Muslims? Do you think saying that Borghezio is talking nonsense is the same as saying I love Muslims? You're more foolish than you seemed. And again, where have I praised mass immigration? You didn't even try to answer that... Where did I say that Italians are happy about immigration? You know, Panz, I simply believe that from everything I've said (just to pass the time) on this page, you didn't understand a damn thing. It's not that you're contesting what I said, you're contesting what you think my words could have meant if I had a brain like yours... it's a bit convoluted, but it's the only way to justify the idiocy you've shown on this page.