nes Banned

"Well, then you're really clueless." What do you think I wrote it for as the beginning of comment 13? I don't know, if you want, I can go grab a couple of puppets, a little theater, and try to explain it to you using the method "You learn by watching."

look what a fool I was born... the phrase that leaves me perplexed anyway is this: "If one is born with the face of Al Pacino, he can do whatever he wants (but also the first De Niro)." because if someone is born with the face of Al Pacino I understand perfectly that he can do whatever he wants, but what I don't understand is what it means that even someone born with the face of (I suppose "of") the first De Niro I can't decipher. I mean, did De Niro change his face? Because it seemed to me that we were talking about faces in your comment.

What has changed in De Niro's face???

geeno: you actually don't understand... comment 127: "the discussion doesn't start from your 4, it starts from the comment you left" I couldn't care less about the vote from a teen. If they had given it a 5, the "problem" (which isn't really a problem, mind you) would be the same. And I'll tell you more, nowadays I wouldn't give this album a 5 either.

"It doesn't seem to me that anyone who leaves a comment is always obligated to justify it, and that all Debaser users feel compelled to justify every comment they make. That's what reviews are for. I'm not saying that arguments aren't necessary, let me clarify, but if someone doesn't feel like it, they shouldn't feel obliged because in the end, they are comments and not reviews." Teen, are you telling me that for the evaluation of an unknown record, the single opinion of the reviewer (who is not a critic but a passionate person enjoying writing in 99% of cases) is more important than the dozens of opinions found in the comments? Come on, you've been here long enough to understand how the site works. I hope it's me who misunderstood.

"It may also be that someone—like in my case—wants to leave a brief comment without too many 'arguments', simply perhaps due to a lack of desire and/or time. Teen, if you're lacking desire and time, you can just not comment; otherwise, don't complain if criticism comes your way./// 'It doesn't seem to me that someone who leaves a comment is always obliged to justify it, and that all debaser users feel compelled to argue.' No, of course, debaser thrives on criticism and controversy indeed./// 'If someone doesn't want to, they shouldn't feel obliged.' Of course not, but I repeat, they can't complain if criticism pours in, especially if the comment oscillates between provocation and stupidity./// 'So if to me album x seems nothing particularly miraculous for my ears compared to common opinions, I say so.' Well done, it would just be enough for you to close every post with a nice 'at least that's how it is for me' because, regardless of what you say, your comments seem written by someone who has the truth in hand and is eager to distribute it on a large scale./// 'This album is objectively a miracle' but for me it equally remains a 4 at most.' Then, Teen, don't pretend not to understand; I've told you three times: I don't give a damn about your rating, the criticism is aimed at what you've written. You could have given it a 5, and the criticism would have still come./// 'If their music isn't liked, do we have to force ourselves to like it based on these "objective values" that you claim exist?' Of course not; one usually says what they think. You, I repeat, seem to want to spread a new gospel: 'art according to Teen.' The problem is that it isn't particularly authoritative as a text (no offense). It's a communication issue (this is at least the third time I'm telling you this, and I don't see why you keep countering by asking me questions): you express subjective opinions as if they were absolute truths. I'll close with the next comment."

No offense to anyone, but I believe the best zot of all is this one (maybe you’ve already mentioned it, in which case I apologize for the unnecessary repetition). Album Divino - Il Divino Otelma - Recensione di puntiniCAZpuntini

claypool: I saw him live for the first time this year and I consider him a genius of entertainment; I spent 3/4 of the concert laughing. (Great concert, quite a lot, so don’t get me wrong). My response macaco was in reference to the artist, not the record in question (which I haven’t listened to yet).

"but do you understand nes's comments??? I mean, for 99% they consist of sentences by others that he rewrites. The point is that among round brackets, square brackets, spondees and bispondees, that 1% he adds himself I can't seem to find" 10 to 1 that if I talk to you, you understand and get what I mean.

teen: "So you're the one judging the evaluations? You're the one defining and recognizing the undoubtedly valid products?" No teen, it's not me; there are objective values that, if you can't grasp, there's nothing we can do about it. This album is objectively a miracle; Halloween is objectively a masterpiece. And the discussion doesn’t start from your 4, but from the comment you left...///
"If I don't like something, I say so without pretending to express a truth." Teen, then learn to express yourself because these two concepts as expressed: "nothing really miraculous"; "but come on!!... if these were the masterpieces... 2.5 at most" claim to be absolute truths./// "I left a normal comment saying that for me it’s not a miraculous album." No teen, you didn’t say that for you it’s nothing miraculous; you said it’s not miraculous, period. You expressed an absolute judgment... I had already mentioned some time ago that your issue is probably mainly a communication problem...