Voto:
"The inaccuracies ("macroscopic", huh) would be..." No, (stop changing the subject, are you stupid or just pretending?) the macroscopic inaccuracies would be: "the most beautiful 90 cinematic minutes of the last 10 years" "in the West - at least as far as I'm concerned - little has rivaled the depth of 'Hero' in this decade"; "Superb screenplay, a masterpiece in its own right regardless of the brilliance of the project."; the phantom "Conceptual superiority"./// "Around here, one can also demonstrate the undemonstrable" yes, your review is a demonstration of that: <<I don't know a blessed thing about cinema, I don't know anything about Eastern cinema, but I'll stuff a review with random words that sound cultured, so people think I know what I'm talking about...>>/// "I think (but I could be wrong) that those who intervene to criticize without even having read the review are wrong regardless" I too, but this has nothing to do with it and your constant changing of the subject is starting to be annoying.///Then you talk about accusations against you for taking over the site, about Christ, about Pinochet, about coups... my boy, you’re not well.../// And stop with this story about whether it’s an adapted subject or not. It’s cinema; I couldn't care less where it comes from. You talk about masterpieces? Ok, let's talk about camera movements, long takes, editing, photography, color saturation (c'mon, if you don't talk about it in Hero, when will you?), let's talk about cinema, damn it! For two days you've been going on about hot air, if this is your way of talking about cinema, it’s better if you go back to prog, at least I don't care about that and I won't get sucked in.///"Praising a filmography based on nationality is partially justifiable, partially utterly senseless" is a natural thing: in the 50s/60s, documentary cinema came from Italy; then Hollywood took over, in the years from the 20s to the 40s, German films were masterful. Cinema is a matter of schools and funds invested. The new French films (those from the last 3 years) ridicule the last 15 years of French cinema (almost all of it to be thrown out). Why? Because the funds for cinema have increased (but maybe with the crisis they'll decrease again). In Italy, 70% of cinema funding goes to cinepanetoni... talking to you about cinema is becoming depressing, Matteo, seriously, go back to music: you can bother me whenever you want, here it's getting a bit tough. What’s so genius about (Sympathy for) Lady Vendetta? Nothing, but it came out less than 10 years after Hero, it's Eastern, has a screenplay superior to that of Hero (which really has none, but never mind, we've already seen that here you can't pull a rabbit out of a hat), and a better photography (and certainly less clever). It’s not a genius film, it’s just better than Hero (which according to you is the definitive film, something only Kubrick, Kurosawa, or Antonioni could make... and Lady Snowblood is so cool, but that said, Lady Vendetta in comparison is more than a masterpiece. NB: Lady Vendetta is not a masterpiece... it’s just much better than Hero. To be even clearer and to avoid you changing the subject again: do you want to talk about incredible Eastern cinema? Go to Korea. You won’t find masterpieces, but you will find the best of the East. PS: in the "who has the longest one, who has seen the most" race, excuse my frankness but you lose from the start. Avoid starting it. But didn’t we conclude? Oh yes, we did conclude: you’re a phony and now you’ll educate yourself with Korean cinema. PPS: Lady Vendetta closes an ideal trilogy; watching it alone and comparing it to Lady Snowblood means... yes, come on, we get it... Sympathy for Mr. Vendetta and Old Boy (in that order) in case you were wondering (I think those are the three most famous Korean films abroad)."