nes Banned

DeRank : 19,86
DeAge™ : 6159 days • Here since 1 august 2009
Shakira She Wolf
Voto:
Instead of shittily reviewing a shitty album with a shitty fake, couldn’t you put more effort into real life and try to get laid?
Tim Burton Dark Shadows
Voto:
So it's not the usual "Burton's latest (crappy) movie"? Is it a Tim film like "Sleepy Hollow"? Wow, I've been waiting for this for over ten years then. And to think that from the trailer it looked like the usual crap that, since Planet of the Apes, I’ve slowly gotten used to digesting. HJHHJIJ: Burton has never been anything more than pure entertainment, and if he’s back to doing it the way he used to, that’s great. Good job, geo! (It goes without saying that if the final scene, like in the last films, rains down on the plot and lasts less than 5 minutes, I'll come back and ask you for a refund for the ticket). PS: What do you mean by special effects? Because in the last 2 films, T. heavily relied on computer graphics for backgrounds, achieving disastrous results. I don’t necessarily want the sets from Sleepy Hollow, but I would like to know that it wasn’t shot 50% with green screen.
Sam Peckinpah Cane di paglia
Voto:
Certo, invia pure il testo e procederò con la traduzione.
Orbital Wonky
Orbital Wonky
14 may 12
Voto:
"If it had been a Metal album, you would have commented with 'they would have done better to break up after...'. As far as I know, they broke up in 2004. Now they must have run out of money and are putting out the 'dude-attracting disc'. Eight years after the farewell (an event that speaks for itself). I don’t understand why, if the reunions are done by rockers, it's crap, while if someone less popular with the Disney/Coca-Cola audience (not even that much) does it, it's a welcome return... If they were metalheads, I'd say they peaked after just two albums and have been absolutely avoidable since 2001. [A necessary and boring parenthesis attempting to break a lance in favor of the electronic duo-> Since the late '90s, they also did the soundtrack for 'event horizon' (the most pointless yet cool horror since the first Alien), which would earn them about 50,000 points. But, First: they weren't alone on the spaceship; and Second: soundtracks don't count. Seriously, they don't count; either you do Jesus Christ Superstar, or forget it! <-End of the boring and, in the end, stupid parenthesis]. However, they're not metal (yeah, I was talking about the fact that they were metal... Almost forgot what I was talking about) and between singles, EPs, and remixes, they release various stuff beyond their studio albums. So, that's material I don't know, and there may have actually been interesting things continuing in that area."
Darren Aronofsky Black Swan (Il cigno nero)
Voto:
"Of course, it’s the musical and choreographic contributions, that is to say, the staging, that make everything brilliant." Here, there is absolutely nothing brilliant. For heaven's sake, let's stop throwing around the word genius every three posts! Then excuse me, but if Aronofsky didn't suffer from a lack of ideas, he would have produced an original film in ten years. Instead, he just stays up there on his pedestal as an underground genius (even though by now he’s as polished as Burton, or almost) repeating the same four things in the exact same way. I wasn't bored by the film; it’s not aesthetically ugly, and it even has a more than adequate rhythm.
Darren Aronofsky Black Swan (Il cigno nero)
Voto:
"I recognize that 'Black Swan' has its strengths." Yes, the rival ballerina of Portman has quite a figure. To put it bluntly, Black Swan is two hot girls getting it on, and all three are surrounded by a pointless movie. But that’s not true; if it were any other film, I’d probably consider it decent. However, it’s by Aronofsky, so it’s not good at all. Darren can only do one thing, and he’s been recycling it for over ten years. What really gets my goat (and should do the same for anyone who continues to follow him) is that he made a phenomenal film in his career (the debut 'π - Theorem of Delirium') and it’s the least known. Sure, it didn’t have Portman, it didn’t have Cassel, it didn’t have Rourke, it didn’t have the amphetamines and the vein infections... But for heaven’s sake, it was a film by Mathon and above all, ORIGINAL. All the films this blessed Aronofsky has made since are faded and pseudo-polished copies of it. In reality, though, I haven’t seen 'The Fountain' and maybe it breaks away from the usual game of: "discomfort, alienation, anxiety, anguish, and despair"; but certainly everyone who’s talked to me about it has advised me to keep my distance.
Gavin O'Connor Warrior
Voto:
poor film, at times the direction is even valid (the fights shot entirely with the tele or with the zoom are definitely effective), but the plot is disappointingly shallow, the dialogues almost touch the embarrassing, and the story of the fighter who fights to make money and save his family, I don't know if it has already been used a thousand times or if it's just a potential stereotype, but it gives the entire film a sense of artificiality that makes "The Land Before Time" feel like an original and credible film. In all this mess with neither head nor tail, however, Hardy remains exceptional: he manages to make a character desperate that only a few actors in the world would not make ridiculous. Then, it’s obvious that HERE ---> <<I care about you, brother!>> can do nothing even for him.
Anne Rice Intervista col vampiro
Voto:
Carmilla is essential for "vampire fans," remedy it. Coppola's own Dracula is the fusion of Stoker's story within the atmosphere of Carmilla. A review that is enjoyable to read from beginning to end, but, unfortunately, inaccurate.
Warsaw Warsaw
Warsaw Warsaw
3 may 12
Voto:
So much stuff. Ah, someone had already said it.
Korn Korn
Korn Korn
1 may 12
Voto:
Don't worry: people who complain about your review do so because they are convinced you are a fake, and they probably haven't even read the review. And keep in mind that 90% of the time this site is populated by people who could only write short notes in third-grade lined notebooks, so don't pay too much attention to the criticisms: the review isn't exactly stellar, but it's the first one, and personally, I've seen much worse. I have two tips for you: avoid recounting the albums song by song (the infamous track by track), 90% of people find it tedious. And if there's an album already reviewed on the site, avoid reviewing it again: this also annoys the users on Debaser who have a stick up their ass.
The album is pretty dope, one of the best in the genre, the best of Korn from practically every perspective. It's funny to see people acting all "hardcore anti-pop" and then saying that "Follow the Leader" is better than this, or that up to "Issues" they were EXCELLENT (which before criticizing someone for how they write, it would be appropriate to understand the meanings of the words in their own language...).
Hi and welcome! While I'm at it, I’ll also tell you to fuck off. So, in no time at all, you'll discover all the fantastic pros and cons of this site! :) (also avoid the smileys, they really annoy me, thanks.)