cappio al pollo

Nice suggestion, but they didn't convince me on myspace.

Good. They might be a gap I need to fill.

Great. Really an excellent (and unexpected) debut. Congratulations indeed, you should grace us more often with pages like this. Just one thing is unclear to me: why (or in what sense) were the applause "entirely out of place"? As for Testa, sooner or later I will have the chance to delve deeper. Regards and kisses.

Three-dimensional animated marzipan men suck.

No, but don't take it personally. I appreciate your effort, it’s just that the approach tends to be counterproductive, especially in this context, probably due to the passion.

AMONG THREE HUNDRED WHALES, ON THE DRY AND ASLEEP, THEY WANTED TO KILL ME TOO, THEY WANTED TO KILL ME TOO, THEY WANTED TO KILL ME TOO. BUT NO! DO NOT TOUCH MY FLESH, IT IS NEITHER WHITE NOR SOFT. AH NO! Epic epilogue. Unfortunately, it’s not my field, but the review is enjoyable and well-written, as always. I know...

Rosellina, registered for the occasion, would do well to withdraw anyway. She is trying to bring water to her mill by doing nothing but rowing in the opposite direction. She will know how to forgive me.

I wanted to say two things: 1) The Dictionary goes to sleep (and up to this point it's even a bit amusing), reassuring those present with a "I'll respond to everyone tomorrow," and upon his return, he can only say "just one thing, be ashamed. To compare Michael Jackson to Da Vinci is atrocious. You deserve all the worst possible." In short, it’s just a matter of clinging to a nuance (a reinterpretation of a quote) like this [dicesi "arrampicarsi sugli specchi"], when it seems quite clear that there aren’t all these affinities between the two and that THE CRAZY ONE was exclusively referring to the context he mentioned. 2) HELLHOLE says "You've broken my balls; if you don't like an artist, don't listen to them and don't write reviews about them." I must correct you, as the problem isn't exactly that. A review is an evaluation that can also be negative, but the issue is that it must adhere as closely as possible to the truth and not to an extremely subjective and decontextualized assessment. This is where our Dictionary falls short. Personally, I would prefer not to be mistaken for a Jackson fan trying to defend him at all costs. I'm not. I simply strive to be as clear-headed as possible. Regards.

Pathos, misinformation, and rampant ignorance on this page. The ability to evaluate contextually (and objectively) is zero. Is it so hard for you to simply distinguish the Velvet Underground from Michael Jackson? Know that all of this confirms your limited knowledge of music, contrary to what you try to make it seem. Feel cool.

FEED MY EGO, FEED MY EGO A GO GO! I often find myself humming it in my head when I go running, to keep the pace.