telespallabob

Honestly, I would only go to see the lightning if I had a time machine. Better to see them in '77 than today, right? Anyway, welcome to Debaser. The question arises: what made you decide to review this album that had a pile of reviews even before it came out on CD due to the history of downloads? I think I’ll save it for next time and look for some unreviewed albums instead.

It would be a fantasy, did I understand correctly?

You really did a great job with this.

Purpulan is right, there are remarkable rediscoveries that unfortunately are often unknown to me.

You could have spent a couple more words, surely the level of the discovery (not the quality, since I don't know the record) deserves two more stars.

The insufficiency, why? I have two reasons: first of all, the review itself is not the best but decent (in theory, it would warrant 3 stars). The point that I disliked entirely pertains to the final sentence. Everyone can do what they want, even write under the influence of alcohol (a situation that does not necessarily lead to negative results), but I find this sentence very serious: "I hope I haven't made too many mistakes, and if I have, well... fuck you." With that "fuck you," you disrespect the reader and, perhaps, even the group you intended to describe because you do not provide a valid description for someone unfamiliar with the album in question to look it up and potentially delve deeper into the discussion. It more generally concerns the distorted use of the site.

Well done, Jonah, nice proposal.

He's done many, fortunately.

I didn't really like the review that much, but it was decent.

Nice review. May I ask a question: why add 4 genres that don’t pertain to music?