telespallabob

I recently discovered Mordid Angel, and in my opinion, this album is around a 6.5. Nothing special.

I don't know them, but it seems like a decent proposal; I'll evaluate it personally.

The fact that this is the eleventh review is an issue; in theory, you could have written a comment on the previous ones to express how this album makes you feel, even though I believe that would have been limiting for you. I don't leave a rating for reviews either, because I think it's difficult to determine what it is (at least from my perspective).

Interesting point, the tracks posted on Myspace don't seem too bad, even though I'm not a big fan of the singer's voice.

@Sfascia Carrozze. Thank you for the response. The fact that you are one of the Editors is something I will keep in mind; this way, if I want to express an opinion regarding the deCasi or any other matter that I consider valuable for the site, I will feel free to write to you directly (if you are willing). It may be that I haven't fully understood the function of the deCasi; in this case, it will be my duty to try to discover it, although I still believe it is not fully appreciated. I might also write to you in more detail about this issue eventually. I hope that you can also explain it to the entire site (perhaps with a "service" editorial).

@Ole, you had a laugh and called me pathetic. What can I say? You are right when you say that I take myself too seriously; I tend to be spontaneous and say what I think, even in strong tones. Fortunately, I found a space like this, and I thank those who provide it and those who frequent it. I don't think expressing oneself is wrong. I tend to give too much weight to things; it’s a limitation of my character. Perhaps I should approach life with more lightness and a smile, as you suggest, considering that every word expressed on a keyboard has relative value.

Now with the in-depth analysis, we’re all set! Aside from these good tips for beginners, I won't give a rating to the album not because I don't know them but because I listened to them some time ago. Maybe I’ll look around and if I find it, I’ll add that judgment as well. The review is fine.

@Mr. SfasciaCarrozze. I don't believe that Mr. Cornell or anyone in his place should get angry. Personally, I think that criticism should come from the entire site, in a structural and determined manner. You say that this section of the site is not a public shaming: that is a misjudgment, and let me explain why. When discussing literary cases, the value and effort that a deReviewer puts into submitting a piece is undermined. The fact that they are non-canonical and express their knowledge and feelings is something extremely positive and must be valued as such. After all, many pages contain personalistic messages or vulgar phrases (I think of Mr. Puntinicazpuntini's review of "Maledetti" by Area; if you don’t remember it, I invite you to look it up), and yet they have been included on the homepage. Furthermore, we have seen incredible reviews, something with truly astounding and hallucinatory content, I add. With the concept of "literary cases," a bubble of discredit is created; a serious judgment is passed against the message contained and those who have expressed it with passion; it is a moral and psychological public shaming. A psychological violence is committed, as if I were to say, "that person is crazy" and justify this by saying, "I even gave him some space," yet the judgment and the human discrimination have already been perpetuated. I prefer strong comparisons: putting a review in the literary cases is like sticking a symbol on the body (perhaps you are familiar with the yellow stars from Hitler's memory). Moreover, defining "literary cases" as resources of the site is a plain nonsense, and there are two reasons supporting my thesis. The first is that the link to the "cases" is tiny, the second is that these reviews do not appear in the author's list. A disparagement is committed, not a valorization. Finally, I allow myself a personal question: are you an editor? Awaiting your response, I send my Best Regards.

So please forgive me for the incorrect definition.

Personally, I thought this album was crap, but maybe I'm wrong. Good review.

We are at group fakes; as long as they write well and adhere to decency, it's perfectly fine, even if all of this is slightly grotesque.