Adriano Bernard

If I annoy you because I rated it a 1, know that your second-to-last sentence is serious for me, as if with this album they had hit rock bottom, with the subsequent ones they began to scrape it. With the arrival of the various bounce and crush and with the latest album, they dug so deep that they reached the center of the earth. They have never created a song (well, maybe one) or an album that deserved more than a 1. They are the shame of rock; just think that Paris Hilton is to pop what they are to rock.

Core, I'm sorry, but you've hit a dead end with me: I was a Bon Jovi fan, so I've listened to their entire discography. There are no prejudices here; they play C-grade rock. While they used to present themselves almost as hard rockers, now they come off as sappy, American-style sentimentalists of the lowest category, stuff that only the teenage girls who adore them can swallow. It's crap, and there's no middle ground. Bye.

killgod, "watch your back: I’ll be chewing them for you."

4:30

dboon, since you know them and there's no review, could you tell me what genre they play and who they "sound like"? I would appreciate it, bye.

...4.5...

Juve in B, don't you dare be racist towards us Romans. Kenny, I believe, is playing a character; anyway, there are idiots in Rome just as there are in Milan or anywhere else. Let's stop being little racists with our noses in the air and not sink into clichés, like saying "fascists." Anyway, Totti is also a built character.

Maginboo: eros STARTED FROM THE FRUIT. Now they have already cleared the table...

X Zarathustra: "You tell me, for example, what Different World has less than one of the historic Maiden openings." ------------>>> It has less in that it’s a faded copy of the other openers; I would say that’s precisely the problem. We’re not talking about changing musical genres here; we’re talking about evolving, improving, and reworking. Something the Maidens have absolutely not done: this record is a copy of the previous one, which was a copy of the one even before that (which in turn was a copy of the one before). This is not art: it’s photocopying music to make money. They hit the formula to please the fans and have no intention of "putting themselves out there," of taking risks. It’s quite obvious that if I have a beautiful photo and I photocopy it, the photocopy will be less beautiful (even though still nice, it will be inferior to the original). Then there will be the photocopy of the photocopy and after that the photocopy of the photocopy of the photocopy. The further you go, the more the result will be the same as the starting point but more "faded" and less interesting, until it reaches mediocrity. What do we do, we can’t keep reheating the same soup, can we? Then "The reincarnation of..." remains a nice piece, with a Led Zeppelin-esque solo and Eastern rhythm, but one piece doesn't make an album. Even the album "Fear of the Dark": there were 2 or 3 really great tracks in there, like "Fear of the Dark" and the epic "Afraid to Shoot Strangers," but the rest was rather mediocre. Bye.

Opaltide, but the problem persists: he likes Bon Jovi :)