Surferkangaroo

Well... I agree with Caz. Even though the "Timmy C.-Brad Wilk" rhythmic base is perfect for crossover. Nothing innovative, nothing technically impossible, nothing "extra-mental-wanking" but damn good! Then Morello playing guitar with 380 pedals and using a screwdriver as a slide (pulling out sounds never heard before) and Zack singing all strained out, swinging his dreads with bulging neck veins makes a difference. Caz, come on, tell them to reunite and come play in Sorso at the Billellera so we can go see them together, moshing with an Ichnusa in hand!

Well, the "feggie" is a babe! She should be a playmate instead of singing. They make my hips shake but not to dance. To a good understanding....

vote on the record

"It started to smell rotten during the 1970s, when those perverted fucking pedophiles who take turns sticking their dicks up each other's asses received some sort of social recognition from Parliament, yes, that very bunch of thieving bastard faggots. Sure, freedom of the press is important, but does it make sense to publish a review like that? I believe the question is legitimate."

I like how you write. Well done :)! Truly, congratulations! As for the album, I don't know, I haven't listened to it! But still, good job. If I find it on the shelves and I have some kroner (I'm in Norway) in my pocket, "I'll grab it."

No one said you made a mistake reviewing the "Helmet." It was only suggested that if you really want to review something, you should put in a minimum effort. Otherwise, since there is freedom of the press and opinion, just as you "can" write whatever you like, we "can" comment however we want. The review is unreadable, incomprehensible, it says nothing about the album. You only express an opinion like in a sports bar (where, among other things, they know much less about music than about sports). It’s not a review. Put in a little more effort ;)!

Very well. This page could be tossed in a celebration of joy from everyone, but after all there is freedom of the press and expression, so fine. One can accept it. Joe mm cm kz srv? M prk pttn do you have a paralysis of the tongue and can't write the vowels? Awful review for an awful record played by a (now) awful band. It wasn't like that before!

Donjunio. Perhaps you didn't quite understand what I meant to say, or maybe we just didn't get each other, or perhaps (most likely) I expressed myself poorly! It is far from my intention to belittle a sacred monster like Dylan. By the way, I saw him live two years ago, and I wonder how he still manages to perform!!! Sometimes, seeing these people: him, Lou Reed, Mick Jagger, Keith Richards, Pete Townshend, etc., I think maybe drugs “if taken in (s)moderate doses” aren't so harmful after all. Anyway. My criticism was based on the fact that Ryan Adams and Bob Dylan only share the "musical simplicity" of their songs. But musical simplicity is quite different from being "bad," "uninventive," etc. (by the way, Dylan did those things 40 years ago). For me, beauty in itself is simplicity. That's all! I didn't mean to tarnish your myth ;)!

TERRIBLE! 1 for the choice and 3 for the review, so 2! PLEASE ADD NEGATIVE RATINGS FOR THE ALBUMS!

I really can't stand his voice. I agree with Massimof. The album is not bad but not great either. Still, it's nice to see an ugly and chubby singer once in a while!