geenoo Banned

Emi, as you want to be called, I just wanted to say that you could have kept your review on your PC. Why didn’t you do that? Since you had nothing to do, a nice game of FIFA2009 would have been better; even stones know that Korn suck. We really needed you there since you had nothing to do at that moment... here, another one for the response.

So, do you take comment n.9 for yourself?

Authenticated Giastine, I’m responding to you... because I believe this is an old acquaintance in anonymous and not you. For your/yours joy, I have nothing more to do!!!!! Gustavostrunz, go back to where you came from. And then close it.

"Good evening everyone, this is my first review and I’m writing because right now I have nothing to do......" yes, you made me lose 10 precious seconds and I’m giving you a big ONE. :-D Welcome!

Neuu, ahhhhh "valued much more than I think it's worth; that is, less than zero." Damn, is there anyone who values it at less than zero? Well, me too. We're 1 to 1.

Vellutogrigio, it already seems to me that you've adjusted your stance by stating that reality and the internet should hold the same relevance. As for the "right weight" to give things, who knows who should establish what is "right." In other words, I fully understand that katarsis is a kid who wants to be rebellious by seeking alternative solutions to the masses, different solutions to the pre-packaged ones (besides being very rude). And responding in kind, forcefully, at least for me, certainly doesn’t mean hating him. It means that he has annoyed me, it means that he has crossed the line of due respect. And if you cross that line, I believe it’s good to make it at least noticeable. Why do you see violence in the responses of those trying to isolate his behaviors? I only see legitimate defense. In short, who determines when it is "right" to respond and within what limits? I have an answer: when one does not respect others. This isn’t about accepting absurd ideas, like denying the Holocaust or that man has been to the Moon; it’s about respecting others by regulating how to express one’s ideas, for example. Il_Paolo, your response seems rather unserious to me. With a conclusion that gives me hallucinations upon re-reading: “Come on, the Holocaust really happened.”

Neu overrated compared to whom?

And passion can lead to grammatical and spelling mistakes.

Il_Paolo: your comment no. 75 unsettled me. It made me angry. It also disappointed me. Vellutogrigio: you don’t have a Gandhian line but rather a line that embraces ataraxy... detachment. However, not everyone is haughty, snobbish, and icy as your line suggests. I mean: it’s true we are on the internet in a virtual reality. So why not give it the importance it deserves? What do I care if katarsis in a real reality would never say these things? It says them here and now. And here and now is our reality! Therefore, katarsis is as if it were saying those things to my face, with the added burden of hiding behind anonymity. I could also accept this detachment due to the lack of intent, reasoning, and culture of a katarsis, but perhaps this very detachment, as already suggested, causes more harm than good. This is our reality and if Katarsis even bothered just one of us it would be time to change the air. For me. The legality issue I leave to those who can sue (and I do not deny that something could be found about katarsis...) or those who could do it ex officio. I talk about social well-being that, these days, must also hold value on the internet. In short, what is written here must carry the same weight as reality. Then everyone lives life as they wish. Some with passion, some with detachment.

Slightly contrarian, but not too much. I’d give it a 2.80. My judgment is based on the release of the album and filtered through the subsequent appearances of the singer. However, I would like to emphasize one thing with fifty red markers: why do we judge music by the nonsense artists get up to? Because otherwise, what should we do with Hendrix, Cobain, the Rolling Stones, Morrison, and a good 75% of rock/pop/alt/hard bands from the last 50 years? Do we judge them by the drugs they take? We’re in good shape... The review is bland.