geenoo Banned

DeRank : 3,10
DeAge™ : 7509 days • Here since 19 november 2005
Sentenza Sentenza
Voto:
too pop
Piergiorgio Odifreddi Il Vangelo Secondo La Scienza
Voto:
Stoney, don't worry... if only there were more people who read, think, and write what they think. I have read Matematico impertinente, but I've listened to many interviews and read articles. Anyway, I'm not saying there has to be a god, alright? I don't think I wrote that. I'm just saying that science, as it stands today, can explain why an apple falls on our head, why the sky is blue, why we're made this way... and other fundamental rules. The fact that Odifreddi claims that everything can be explained with these basic rules gives me the creeps.
Metallica Death Magnetic
Voto:
Sanitarium, would you recommend this album to me? Keep in mind that I only have the one with the black cover.
Piergiorgio Odifreddi Il Vangelo Secondo La Scienza
Voto:
Stoney... but who believes in fairytales? Are you kidding? I just said that Odifreddi is being heavy-handed. For example, when he calls those who believe in the Christian religion "cretins." He might be right (according to his limited theorems) but that’s not the way to present ideas and concepts. Do we realize how limited we are in our understanding of the world, space, matter, and all their rules? Are we joking? We know little, very little. This is a truth.
Piergiorgio Odifreddi Il Vangelo Secondo La Scienza
Voto:
That religions have caused (and still cause) a lot of harm and deaths, and worse, is beyond doubt. I was referring to Odifreddi, who also seems to be a "fervent" scientist. He has a way of presenting ideas that is somewhat fanatical. The discourse on religion is extremely complex; I limit myself to thinking that I know nothing, I am not sure of anything, and everything is possible for me. Why limit oneself? Do you think science has discovered everything? Please... and what do we know about what might lie between what has not been discovered and explained?
Akercocke Choronzon
Voto:
My real nickname is Geenoo. Am I unworthy? Why? Come on, I was joking, buddy... keep writing these tall tales on two cheeks. Ah... if you like this kind of stuff, I recommend Fausto Papetti...
Piergiorgio Odifreddi Il Vangelo Secondo La Scienza
Voto:
No, but I am not referring to power over the masses. I am talking about ideas. And in particular about how Odifreddi presents them, as absolute truths in contrast to others' "nonsense." In short, he lives science like a faith.
Bo Diddley The Chess Box
Voto:
What a rough day, huh?
Piergiorgio Odifreddi Il Vangelo Secondo La Scienza
Voto:
Odifreddi is slightly extremist, almost like Catholics. Who can claim to have the truth? Science can become a god just like the one in the Bible.
Akercocke Choronzon
Voto:
I'm saddened that no one points out how much nonsense there is in this review. Vulgar, loutish, and indecent. For a couple of asses, you had to struggle to write a "review."