sfascia carrozze

DeRank : 39,03
DeAge™ : 7564 days • Here since 25 september 2005
AA.VV. "London Booted", A Bastardpop Tribute To The Clash
Voto:
Dear de-reviewer Monsieur Mauri, in the face of the destroyer of prolixity; an enthusiastic and pleasant de-review: in all sincerity, I don't know how much this current record can deeply intrigue me (it certainly piques my curiosity..) as the de-commented seems not exactly "stuff" for the habitual listening of the mephitic ramshackle driver. Regards aplenty. Your S.C. of (dis)trust.
Sofa Surfers Sofa Surfers
Voto:
Dear and sincere de-commentator Monsieur Gabbox, while I completely respect your courteous de-comment, I regret to contradict you (NOT on de gustibus, of course) but the miserable scrap dealer did not shy away from the previous Sofa-production [I quote myself: "..(although dignified).."], indeed I will tell you more; the predecessor "See The Light" intrigued me quite a bit; I simply would have found (modestly) the tonal "turn" present in the new de-reviewed album to be quite remarkable and intriguing. That's all. Warmest regards. Your S.C. di (s)fiduciam.
Sofa Surfers Sofa Surfers
Voto:
Most honorable (and finally you bestow upon me that minimum of attention which I -do not- deserve..) Monsieur The Punisher, it is always a true pleasure to read your witty, profoundly constructive, and intriguing de-comments. I assure you (to avoid any misunderstandings) that the humble wrecker of three thallers has never had any artistic intent in the (exhausting, well put..) wrecking of legacies. For art (in the DeBaserian context), we rely, as is known, on your most remarkable writings, both in the role of de-reviewer and in the role of (lucid) commentator (indeed). Am I mistaken or did I already remind you previously that there is no obligation whatsoever in the vile reading of the verbose wreckages.. so why does it continue/insist/persist? You are now (extraordinarily) aware of the fact that my reviewing style is entirely opposed to yours, so I ask you, at this point and in all honesty, why do you persist?? Happy you... Kind regards. Your most faithful S.C.
Negrita Reset
Negrita Reset
25 nov 05
Voto:
Gentlemen... S-I-G-N-O-R-I... (I would ask for a moment of your attention, in case that wasn’t clear) Why all this fervor against our spectacular Sanremo? This year, everyone in front of the monitor (also because you can't see a damn thing from behind) in mid-February: my informants (under the table and from the source) testify to me that everything will be overseen by Zazzo (Negazione), Sergio (Kina) with the assistance of Alex Spalck (Pankow) in the choreography; foreign guests among many: Nomeansno, Young Gods and the reformed (not in a military sense...) Dead Kennedys. Take it or leave it. Playful regards in abundance. Your trusted S.C.
Hanne Hukkelberg Little Things
Voto:
Dear de-reviewing Monsieur Lello, precious and intriguing as well as curiously noteworthy is Yours: artist and record almost crash-ignored (as always..). Cordial regards. Your S.C. of (dis)trust.
The Wallflowers Breach
Voto:
Dear de-reviewer Mr. Mauri, your comment is both commendable and explanatory; not having listened to the record in question, from your words it seems like a rather trivial work, on the other hand it can be inferred that a listen can be granted without too many convoluted complications. And so it be (?). Respectful saludos. Your S.C. of (dis)trust.
Zero Hour The Towers Of Avarice
Voto:
Dear de-reviewer Monsieur Giorrrrrrgio, being by nature a curious person (I would say more: a literal busybody... with all the often poor aspects of the matter), I must say that your de-reviewing action intrigued me quite a bit; furthermore, I realize that the de-commented album is a little bit distant from the current smash-hits, but having been (in the distant past) an admirer of the first work by the Teatro del Sogno, I would be more than happy to give it a chance. Warm regards et even more. Your S.C. of (dis)trust.
Bongzilla Stash
Bongzilla Stash
25 nov 05
Voto:
Dear and cordial De-Recensoreo Mister ...CAZ..., I would kindly like to ask you whether the shocking effects produced on your slanted de-review are due solely to the (natural) listening of the Bongzilla de-reviewed record, or if within (into the involucrum... Celtic Frost-ian quote) it, beyond the vile-vinyl/chee-dee, there also reside and are kept further psychotropically hallucinogenic substances for use and consumption alongside the listening, which cause unintelligible verbosity. Best regards to you in abundance. Your S.C. of (distrust).
Nine Inch Nails With Teeth
Voto:
Dear De-reviewer Monsieur Undying, astonishment is the immediate definition dictated by the listening of the new Reznorian "work": if for you trivializing (further and dangerously) the already quite "fragile" structures of the recent past means creating (de gustibus) something intriguing: by all means, you are free to express the above (we are, after all, in a democratic regime... AD PERSONAM, but still democracy). I find all the more disappointing and particularly suffocating the new course (let's say from 1995 onwards) undertaken by the charismatic (?) leader... the lucid, thrilling experimentation of cornerstone episodes like "Broken" or its very interesting mini of devastating remixes is (unfortunately) just a diminished memory here. Tracks unworthy of yet another square/useless NU Metal sensation (mamma-mia: que tristesse..). Let’s briefly analyze just the first track: it starts off well: dark, circular, serpentine... then Trent "goes mad," setting everything aside to unleash a chilling jingle/pop anthem that is truly DISCONCERTING… (to be generous). The issue is not the use of limbs or computers... here it’s the proemial "brain" that no longer seems capable of generating anything brave and intriguing for us weary listeners. In any case, a healthy DE GUSTIBUS, in closing, I believe fits wonderfully. Your S.C. of (s)trust.
Opeth Orchid
Opeth Orchid
24 nov 05
Voto:
Thirty/fourty Y E A R S, of course. Renewed greetings.