NickGhostDrake

well done.

The review was already there (easycure) and it was very nice. So much so, I'm taking this opportunity to vote for the album again, stunning.

RESPECT FOR YOU!

Thank you de-blob, you really understand me.

About other sources: everywhere this record is credited as "David Pajo," not just Pajo. I mean, is it important? Anyway, the truth is I wanted to write this review, and that David is one of my favorite artists, but that won't matter to anyone, it barely interests me!

always alive! ;)

Haha guys, I'm not annoyed, far from it :) I just pointed out a perspective; sometimes when we converse through written words, there’s always a risk of misunderstanding. I should have added a few more smiles :) I'm not bothered, really! pajo up your ass!

Thank you... now I'm not so sure about buying it anymore...

All right then!

"I thought there was freedom of choice regarding reviews on this site," in fact, they published it as you can see, and as you can see there's also the freedom to criticize you. Where can you find a more beautiful place than this? "Maybe you felt offended because I didn't slam a nice 5 on your favorite disc by Yorke and company?" No, I wasn't offended at all, believe me. It was just a critique. Maybe you were the one who got offended... "The others on 'Hail to the Thief,' with all due respect, weren't written by the Bertoncelli of a few years ago." With all due respect, I don't think you even read them; Josi's review is ten times better than yours and came years before yours. To finish, a note to Punisher: I didn't understand, are you in agreement with me or not? You say you don't agree with me, and then you make the same critique I did? Must be a habit, huh? :)