puntiniCAZpuntini

If Area had made "1978: Let's All Go Fishing," I would have written a review including 100 and one recipes for cooking seabreams, but since Area made "1978: Punkettoni, give us a blowjob," I wrote the review "1978: punkettoni, give him a blowjob," eh.

I believe the Stooges were NECESSARY, and I think some Hard Rock bands that created Punk were necessary as well; the Punk of '77, the London one, the one properly defined as PUNK, I believe served no purpose other than to create some pretty crappy music. Just look at the bands you mentioned; you have ONLY MENTIONED AMERICAN BANDS. This album was made by Area to throw shade on the London punk of '77, and I say they are right, and you all say it too, given that no one named even one band from the London scene of '77, and all you mentioned were the various offshoots, which, coincidentally, are all American. So I believe Area were right. Then, you all told me "you didn't talk about Area"... but what was I supposed to do? I transmitted the message of this album 100%, that seems sufficient to me. This is not a prog review that talks about punk; it's a review from 1978 that discusses the message contained in 1978, so whether you like it or not, the review is 100% relevant. Their message was filled with rage, and so is the review; in their album, they mock punk, and I do the same. So the review is very much there, and it is perfectly outlined along the lines of the album. You can tell me it disgusts you, but don’t come and say it has nothing to do with it, because that’s a ridiculous statement; it has everything to do with it, not my fault if they got pissed off, oh.

Yeah, yeah, bogus, you all say that, you simple-minded punks.

I say say, today I don't have time, maybe on Monday I'll copy and paste the comments :D. Then damn, this site is called Debaser... come on, it sounds like a punk site, it needed a nice disclaimer like this. I arrived and read Debaser and thought "site for idiot punks", then I read the reviews of LOR15 and said "site for idiot punks", then thank God I read those of Hal. (who will never post here, but deep down I think... heh heh heh...)

Here I didn't just want to piss people off, that's okay too, but everything I've written was thought by the Area and I think the same, I firmly believe that punk is just a simplification or childishness of Rock.

It's not true ajaje, in damned with Humax4 in the first comments we dissect almost the entire Italian prog scene of the 70s, HTML sings, go and reread, hell yeah :D

Those of Maledetta also make you reflect on certain things that perhaps escape the passionate listener. I completely disagree; that "perhaps" weighs seven tons since the extreme metal listener over the age of 12 knows very well that it's all theater. I know millions of metalheads, and none of them have ever said to me that they believe the surrounding show is serious.

Sorry, that one at the end turns you into Logic, it wasn't intentional :)

Logic, don't play dumb :D, this is the third one about Area I've done, you can read the other two with plenty of comments and find Area explored in every corner. With this review I have simply expressed in words what they conveyed in music. Their music has already been DISCUSSED ABUNDANTLY, here I'm talking about their thoughts, which seems sensible to me. Doesn’t it to you, Logic? :)

The implicit meaning is the same Ajeje, you deny the obvious just because he writes it with a joking style, with a joking nickname, and uses the records in question. I'm already jokey by nature, I didn't need to change my nickname :D