puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7942 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
It's not true ajaje, in damned with Humax4 in the first comments we dissect almost the entire Italian prog scene of the 70s, HTML sings, go and reread, hell yeah :D
Voto:
Those of Maledetta also make you reflect on certain things that perhaps escape the passionate listener. I completely disagree; that "perhaps" weighs seven tons since the extreme metal listener over the age of 12 knows very well that it's all theater. I know millions of metalheads, and none of them have ever said to me that they believe the surrounding show is serious.
Voto:
Sorry, that one at the end turns you into Logic, it wasn't intentional :)
Voto:
Logic, don't play dumb :D, this is the third one about Area I've done, you can read the other two with plenty of comments and find Area explored in every corner. With this review I have simply expressed in words what they conveyed in music. Their music has already been DISCUSSED ABUNDANTLY, here I'm talking about their thoughts, which seems sensible to me. Doesn’t it to you, Logic? :)
Voto:
The implicit meaning is the same Ajeje, you deny the obvious just because he writes it with a joking style, with a joking nickname, and uses the records in question. I'm already jokey by nature, I didn't need to change my nickname :D
Voto:
Then this record was PERFECT for the purpose, way more than a punk. They talk shit about punk, I give it a hand. They were angry, I added a raw style to it. This is my favorite review, I have to send it to Fariselli :))))).
Voto:
It's not about shitting on a record like mp does; the beauty of his recs is that he shits on an entire genre (read them again), and I actually like that he speaks his mind. I shit on this whole genre so much that I don't have the guts to look at a punk record among the ones I've reviewed. I prefer Golia Bianca over the Dead Kennedys.
Voto:
But what do you want to talk about? It's all the same, fast-paced rhythm, one-flavor riffs, and a loud voice. Its flaw is that it doesn't have many flaws because it's so simple that, lacking structure, it can't have defects. And then there will be 200 identical punk CDs; I can't tell one band from another except for the singer, does that seem like little to you? And don't tell me "it's the same in metal" because it's not true; every guitarist and every drummer has a very unique sound, I recognize Dimebag's guitar after three seconds. Anyway, what's the difference between this review and that of MP aside from the musical style? Do you think the implicit meaning is different? Answer directly, don't give me perfect answers that don't take a stance, tell me if there's a difference with a "yes" and explain what it is, or with a "no, the implicit meaning is the same." Don't sidestep, just go for it :D
Voto:
Massimof, tell me what good fruits punk has borne. In the '70s, Creedence, Yes, Genesis topped the charts, then punk came in, everything simplified, and from the '80s onwards, crap hit the charts. You complain about today's scene too, so please name the good fruits you’re talking about, one by one. :)
Voto:
Massimof, you respond too about what the difference is between this and a recap of Maledetta Primavera, aside from the writing style. To me, the meaning of both is the same, and they both deserve to be written. The ones from MP are my favorites because they say exactly what they think, even though I don’t agree with them even if they shot me.