puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 7994 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
This is bullshit -> the progressive was becoming just self-indulgent virtuosity the more it evolved the more complicated it became it was becoming unbearable <- It was becoming magnificent, nothing unbearable about it. If it's too complicated for you, go play with Legos. Let it be clear that I don't criticize the idea of resurrecting dead things; I enjoy digging up old stuff, I liked that you reviewed Jimi. Lord Henry, I just clicked on your username and realized I got the wrong person, but there are at least 10 Lords+names here, easy to get mixed up. Little but sure that ATDI are not psych pop.
Voto:
Well, take a look at the albums I've reviewed and commented on and get an idea. I can't just tell you all the bands I like. I've reviewed 50 albums and commented on about 1500, what should I do, write you a book? Check out my username and browse the site, it's designed for that.
Voto:
Mainly Hard Rock, mainly psychedelic but I don't shy away from the noisy stuff. You'll find my whiny comments because you only show up on the reviews of crap albums, it’s not my fault if you only listen to gay stuff, among which I don't know who might come out unscathed first, Motley Crue or Lacuna Coil.
Voto:
But can you read, Bogus? Now you tell me when I ever said that I "FEAR" punk. In the review, I call them "pitiful", "miserable idiots", and I even add that in my opinion punk lasted less than two months, being swept away by a single song from any Prog band, and you put words like "fear the punk" in my mouth? So I guess it's fair to ask: can you read? I agree with everything in your last post, but that’s a conversation that has nothing to do with this, one that I didn’t initiate nor did anyone else; you made it all up yourself, created this nonsense, and dismissed it after two lines. So I’ll go back to the point with a nice "...So?" PS But let's stop putting words in people's mouths that they didn't say, and let's stop changing the subject to twist it however you like; my point is: punk is too simple and too much the same to be considered music, period. No fear, no sociopolitical angle, none of the stuff you’re putting in my mouth; I’m talking about banal and simplistic music, but what are you talking about? You change the subject in every post, inventing imaginary issues; what do you want me to respond to?
Voto:
And what do you mean by "all the walls are covered with at least thirty posters, the apparent mess, and at least five tons of useless junk (including a 3D model of the goddess of justice), among cables and 15W amplifiers. With this attitude, they must have tried to make their studio look as 'lived-in' as possible, but they forgot that we know the last time they used it was in 1996 for Load, since Reload was nothing but a compilation of leftovers from Load"? I mean? Do you really think Metallica goes into the studio just to record an album? Do you study this crap at night? Okay, St. Anger sucks, but to say that now Metallica purposely makes a mess to look cool is a stretch. And then you listen to Finnish gay metal and come here to call Metallica pretentious? Right here, where there are only metal kids, you can say this bullshit.
Voto:
At Dangerous concerts, there was only picking up coins from the ground, a bunch of hysterical queens, overrated more than anything else. If it weren't for them, we might not even have Glam; too bad they weren't run over as kids when they were leaving kindergarten, really too bad.
Voto:
EP crap, the lowest point of their discography.
Voto:
I'm going to see Paoletto Trombetta in Cala Gonone, then if I really get annoyed I’ll quickly head to Sant'Anna Arresi to see Patrizio Metini. This year they won't trick me; missing Billy Cobham for yet another time has marked my existence :D
Voto:
I don’t always write reviews, Massimof; sometimes (including this one) I open discussions. That bullshit about "punk is dead, who cares" is the biggest load of crap I’ve read in months, so let’s trash Jimi, he died in '70. So screw Bonzo Bonham and Keith Moon since they’re dead, long live Meg White who is alive and well... what kind of reasoning is that? CDs still exist, punk can still be purchased; it doesn’t seem to have been pulled from the market. According to your logic, we should stop talking about old music... since it’s dead. And it’s VoodooChild telling me this, who has only reviewed Jimi, whose last album came out 8 years before this one; it’s Lord Henry saying it, who dusted off a PsychPop album from ten years earlier... come on guys, think before you shoot off these nonsense statements or are you acting out of haste? I agree that the themes of Punk were different from those of ‘68, but that’s a discussion you brought up, and I don’t get what purpose it serves to discuss it; that they’re different seems pretty obvious, especially since I like one and not the other, and after agreeing that they are different, there comes a nice... "so what?" or alternatively another nice "therefore?".
Voto:
The most beautiful thing you gave me is "Teresa," the first disc. Panthalassa, being mainly piano, can never excite me like the others because I do like the piano, but not as much as the other instruments; plus, I absolutely love Jaco. I'm sure I'll appreciate Laswell more later, I'm still a bit too Hell Yeah :D