puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7936 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Yeah yeah, you listen to Duul(1?) because she was there -> Ingrandisci questa immagine <- Forget about thanks dad, this was a thank god moment. You can't fool me.
Voto:
I fully approve of the sign, and I also think the slogan "RECENSIONI scritte da chi gli pare" is wrong. I would open a forum on this, regarding changing the sign.
Voto:
First of all, I never said there was anything wrong, I just said that the staff asks us not to create clones; if you want to do it and don’t care, go ahead. Then this<<< without judgments on anyone (unlike the old forums) >>> It’s not true that there are judgments on anyone in the old forums; you haven’t read them, otherwise you wouldn’t say that, or have you read the spam forums with 4 replies? To "unload the chain of the toilet" (and thankfully you don't want to judge anyone), respond to the old forum, the forum goes back up and is visible to everyone, and those who disagree instead of reading your opposing opinion, read 90 opposing opinions, and trust me, that makes a much bigger impact. Then hey, feel free to do it, but I repeat, to me, you’re wasting your time; it’s already all decided, the site is this way, it can’t please everyone but that doesn’t mean it will change.
Voto:
Isn’t it easier to just say “I’m lazy, I don’t feel like reading, I’ll make a new one”? You’d be more honest; this drivel about the worn-out forum is from FancisAward2005. And then you might even complain that no one writes anymore, but do you really think anyone’s keen to repeat the same concept over and over? Once, twice, three times... then that’s it. In the old forums, a conclusion has already been reached; with the domain change from community to italia, a conclusion was already arrived at. The discussion is already closed; if you want to reopen it, go ahead, my only advice is: you’re just wasting time.
Voto:
<<< The old forums are incredibly long, full of comments, they are "worn out">>> Huh? Instead of saying "full of interesting insights," "full of examples and opinions," you say "worn out?" And then "the old people vented"? Huh? Then do one thing, burn all your discographies from the 60s-70s-80s-90s: they are old records, they've already vented, and then they are... worn out.
Voto:
Look for the old forums, they're very interesting; Hal made a really nice one. Now it's also divided into sections, so it's much quicker. I'm not saying that "the proposed topic is crap," rather, I'm just saying "it's already there."
Voto:
I never said I didn't care; I care a lot, that's exactly why I sent everything to hell. You're still a bit naive, but when you understand it better, you'll see why it gets tiresome to read yet another review that spouts nonsense about Dark Side Of The Moon, and yet another forum: "how do you like reviews?" because there's only one rule: "don't clone." If it's already there, one is enough. So that goes against the rules, so he's the one in the wrong, not me. Then there's the issue of review types: The site is like this, and it will stay this way because that's how those who created it and keep it going want it. Nothing is prohibited, nor are standard reviews (because there are also standard ones, see Grass, see Egebam, also see Turkish who is even a boss). What’s annoying is always seeing the latest arrival telling us "a review means..." and explaining the dictionary definition to us... and shouldn’t we add a “who the hell cares squared about how it should be?” I write standard reviews elsewhere where there's a "standard mood"; here I follow the "debaser mood," and I don't go telling the standard, "hey damn, but this is standard!" so it's ugly for a standard to come and say, "hey damn, but this isn't standard!" And I repeat: the only rule is "please avoid cloning."
Voto:
Giò, watch out because that section is addictive, Sirchia told me.
Voto:
Resist - Kosheen - Recensione di G <- This is a review written by one of the two supreme leaders of the committee. Go to the ptr, ask them the same question you wrote here, but I think you need to change the subject: "Supreme leader, why don't you open a section where standard reviews are made?"
Voto:
But are we still having these talks? They've already been had a million times, Sleater, your forum has gone to hell because it’s a clone of two hundred others, there are no rules here, some like one thing and some another, and some shape their tastes depending on the subject. This issue arose more than two years ago now; you can read the old posts and, if you want, continue the discussion. Ptr, you ask, "I tell the DeBaser committee, why not open a section dedicated to musical stories?"... they've already done that, didn't you know? Here’s the link -> Recensioni scritte da chi vuole - DeBaser <- In that section of the retetelematica, you can talk about music however the hell you want, with stories, with rants, or with descriptions, without any stylistic rules whatsoever.