puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 7978 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Here, you're a poor fool: You’ve never heard the Ac/Dc of the 70s. You talk nonsense, you hear a piece of a band exaggeratingly from afar and you start rambling. Rock Blues Ac/Dc? Where’s the melancholy of the Blues in Ac/Dc from the 70s, where’s the fingerpicking, where are the slow and stretched solos? Just do me a favor and avoid spewing bigger bullshit than you already have. How the hell can you say that the NINTH album of a band you like, and then the OTHERS are repetitive? Back In Black is the NINTH, not the first; it's the first of the second Ac/Dc which I think suck even more than you do, but you don’t know the ones from the 70s (and I made that very clear) – you’ve never heard them, and you keep rambling on like always. Go back to talking about laundry women in Kyuss and lost children in Neurosis, at least that way you’ll move some 14-year-olds, you fool.
Voto:
You've never done reviews of AC/DC; if you do, I'd gladly read it and have a laugh. I've never talked about cartoons with you; it's you who intruded on a discussion between us. So, musically speaking, what do AC/DC from the '70s objectively lack in terms of quality and composition? Why do you associate them with the type "Romeo truck drivers, 1.80 meters tall, who support Lazio and listen to Fiorello's best of"? I don't find references to '70s AC/DC in Fiorello. Why do you? Which album do you consider the worst? Which song? Which member do you not like? Why don't you stop saying nonsense?
Voto:
Yes, but why? You always write the same things: "I’ve written a lot of stuff," "read the reviews," "I had nothing better to do," "everyone hates me"... but you never talk about music. What does "music for truckers" mean? For truckers who know about music and own 8,000 vinyls? For truckers who carried Pink Floyd's equipment around for the shows? For Belgian truckers? Romans? 1.80 meters tall? What the hell does "for truckers" even mean? Make yourself clear. From your posts, it only comes across that you’re not doing well, but when it comes to music, it’s completely unclear.
Voto:
It is not specified anywhere, nor has Patton ever talked about it, so they wrote it all together as the Credits say; otherwise, Patton would have broadcast it from the rooftops. What we know for sure is that Martin didn't count for shit and just annoyed everyone, slowing down the work. Anyway, Faith No More belongs to Bill Gould; no one pays attention to that, but he was the Leader, that's for sure.
Voto:
Every hole is a trench, but in the ass, it's an epic.
Voto:
Yes, yes, it's true Zion, and Moana is a milestone of Death.
Voto:
Anyway, putting aside the exhausting battle over the last bullshit for a moment, in a few weeks the DVD of the Pulse Tour is coming out: now that's something that truly sucks, it should be used as a coaster.
Voto:
Ah ah ah ah, poor fool, you’re first because "duty first and then pleasure," or since you like Latin, here’s a nice "Dulcis In Fundo" for you... and go take a stroll around Punta Raisi, my friend Turiddu, there you go.
Voto:
And why do you find them repetitive and out of touch? Explain yourself better, because right now it only shows that you don’t have the knowledge to describe them. Then, as usual, your troubled little brain gives us a nice outcome: first you come in with <<< With this crap, you’ve shown your taste in music… my goodness… >>> and then you finish with <<< De gustibus, right? >>>. So “de gustibus” my ass, it’s too easy to dodge the question like that. What’s wrong with them? Come on, let us understand what’s going on in that head of yours apart from all that repressed anger. Your album reviews outside your usual patterns are just random images fired off in a completely wrong context, from Miles Davis to Kyuss to Neurosis, just tons of nonsense crucified on albums you can’t describe because you lack the knowledge and the listens necessary to do so. You’re just a repressed caricature, that’s all.
Voto:
<<< something that only the group's imagination and particularly Patton's superb directing ability could create. >>> Patton really did very little on A.Dust, I mean very little. The Creator of Angel Dust seems strange but is mainly the "less known" Bill Gould, in close alliance with Puffy and producer Matt Wallace. Martin basically only played the parts in the studio and did the solos, while Patton contributed more or less as he did on The Real Thing. Anyway, I don't like the review; it's like a thousand others on the web.