puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7904 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
In my opinion, he probably knows it by heart. Imagine that first he says "Rap & Jazz = shit," then he uses Miles Davis as an example of "supreme goodness." If he hears Doo Bop, he might just have a stroke.
Voto:
Listening to records is now outdated. Culture and musical preparation are now measured in gigabytes. If you have less than 50 gigabytes of mp3s, you're gay. From 50 to 100, you're good; from 100 to 200, you're cool. Beyond a terabyte, you become Scaruffi. In person, you know, an immediate transformation upon reaching the one thousand one hundred and twenty-fourth gigabyte.
Voto:
With this fabulous statement where a respectable job like any other becomes a term of offense, you immediately become part of the true Gilmourians. Maybe now you could rank valid human beings based on their occupation; we're curious.
Voto:
“For you what I feel will be old or mean nothing to you,” No, we like it a lot. You set limits, we embrace. We are tender, so much.
Voto:
The Firewater are great. If that piece of shit Patton moves, Denison is ready to roll out the new Tomahawk as well. He says it's heavily inspired by Native American music. Ah, but I almost forgot... contaminations are pathetic.
Voto:
My theory is no longer a theory but a fact. I've met many Gilmourians, and they are all either idiots or losers or both. We have examples right here: this guy is both. Primiballi is a Gilmourian, and an astronomical loser who promotes his blog with every post. Floydman is a Gilmourian, and let’s not even go there. Or just go to the Gilmour or Floyd recs and you’ll find a thousand Gilmourians, but not a single one with a brain. There’s a logic to it too: if someone believes that the only critiquable side of Floyd (Gilmour, precisely) is their strength, they have some issues. Think of a smart Gilmourian; try to see if you know one. We all know: they don’t exist.
Voto:
"It's not my age that makes me categorical, but today's society." But is this already a human case? If not, I would like to personally nominate it.
Voto:
<< it's not enough to just be a Gilmourian to understand music... >> But that wasn't the point. The point is: if you're a Gilmourian, in 99.7% of the cases, you're a gaggio. You confirm this. And remember well that we are talking about Gilmour, not the Floyd. There's a huge difference.
Voto:
In a review of Gilmour - I don't remember neither when nor with whom nor exactly which review - we came to decree an axiom stating that 99.7% of Gilmourians are either gaggio, or coglione, or both. Here’s another confirmation of the axiom, which is never wrong. Axiom reaffirmed yet again.
Voto:
No no come on, 5.