puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 7949 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Space: you eliminate the introduction to the nursery, the pointless track by track, the unnecessary history of the band... and you have all the space to say how this stuff sounds. You mentioned that they cover a Dylan piece, not that they plagiarize anything. After all, just do a ballad and you are already drawing from Dylan. So you didn’t say anything, part two. Same goes for Deep Purple, you didn’t say anything, part three. << The review is rated based on several factors: >> The review is rated based on whatever the hell you feel like. No rules, everyone has their own, and they’re all valid. << Personal tastes come last, which are always subjective. >> Not always. << But I don’t recall ever saying that Bob Dylan covered Gotthard. >> By saying that Mighty Quinn is by Gotthard, you stated that Bob Dylan covers Gotthard. This is the only thing you've said, after all. Diluted in two reviews of eight thousand characters. Wow, what a density of content.
Voto:
But I'm not offended either. I was explaining "my method," I didn't want to criticize yours. I have given the explanation clearly: to me, it's ignorant. When you criticize, you always seem irritated, but trust me, I'm not. We're just chatting.
Voto:
Everyone has their method. As for me, I limit myself to evaluating the musical content. If you give a 4 to an album that deserves a 1, you’re a 1. If you review the Gotthard claiming they are the best of Switzerland, it means you don’t know Switzerland, you’re a 1—don’t talk about what you don’t know. If you review the Gotthard without even listing one of the 18 million bands they take inspiration from, it means you don’t know hard rock, you’re a 1—don’t talk about Hard Rock. I read another review where the Pink Floyd were said to do Hard Rock, with the infamous Hush, and Bob Dylan was covering Mighty Quinn by Gotthard. But come on, please. I’m for natural selection: an ignorant person learns first and then can speak. There are a lot of people on this site who shouldn’t be allowed to write, and they have the decency not to. Take geenoo, for instance—he doesn’t know a thing, he’s clueless... but at least he stays quiet. He just limits himself to spouting nonsense in the comments. Everyone has their method, but for me, even if Dante Alighieri reviewed Kyuss labeling them as Thrash Metal, he’d be a 1. Form is just a sideshow.
Voto:
Nothing, but it's evident that you've listened to maybe, exaggerating, 50 albums. 70 perhaps, but 20 just in passing.
Voto:
Winter is the warmest season for hunting the human condition. Run, Forrest, run.
Voto:
In a world of nigga, white guys d'it betta.
Voto:
But aren't you ashamed to buy their records when you see that retired Kiedis flailing around like a spastic? Someone probably still needs to explain to him that gesturing is a way to keep time on particularly challenging metrics. He flails around like an idiot and makes a rhyme every hour, keeping time like kindergarten kids with rhythms that come in torrents in English. The last video I saw was embarrassing; he doesn't even rap but still gestures. He looks like the Duracell bunny.
Voto:
I never understood what people find in these RHCP, a decent revival made by four idiots who have been bouncing around like morons for 30 years. Four fucking punk junkies who occasionally get crowned as "inventors"... what a blasphemy. The only one who's worth anything is Frusciante, who joined later. But when I say "worth," I mean "worth," nothing more.
Voto:
Bloodsugarsexmagic is a Funk Rock album like many others; it doesn’t even reach - not even if we want to exaggerate - the level of things like Maggot Brain, Black Merda, or Sly & The Family Stone. It's a Funk Rock album that arrived late, contributing nothing new to the genre and not even fully utilizing it (the genre). It remains a great album, but its value has been enriched by the fact that during that time, almost no one was making Funk Rock. It had no competitors. SCIENCE is a Crossover album (in the TRUE FINAL SENSE OF THE TERM CROSSOVER) that came out in a period where the competition was incredibly high; it's the second album of a band that many were "waiting to pounce on," and it surprised EVERYONE (find me a negative review from that time, go ahead). It added many elements to the genre, exploited it to the fullest in all its parts, and there isn’t even half a second that isn’t mixed brilliantly. Since tastes can't be "measured," let’s measure historical value: BSSM is a Revival album, SCIENCE is an album that set the rules. The comparison is incomparable; beyond personal tastes, SCIENCE is a masterpiece, and BSSM is a good album. Or, can you find something in BSSM that you can't find in Funk Rock bands from the '70s? Because there isn’t any. PS: I listened to this Light Grenades and it left me completely indifferent.
Voto:
True, you can also notice the sparkle of the Rolex on the cuff...