Underground Life Questo soave sabba
Voto:
you went and fished me out! these were the ones my big brother (one of many) now forty-six (is that how you write it?), used to listen to in the very early 80s. I was a scared little kid - teenager, but I still remember the cover of the vinyl. It wasn't this album, though. Now I think I'm going to cry a little...tears of nostalgia. Well done, well done, well done. Regards
Takeshi Kitano Sonatine
Voto:
In addition to those mentioned, I would add "Violent Cop." Really tough. Kitano is great. I haven't seen this one yet; I'll make sure to check it out. Good review, good "ocular" debut :)
Michail Bakunin Stato e anarchia
Voto:
@FIQUATA: well yes, Stirner (like Nietzsche) is an author that should be studied, not just read. The risk of misinterpreting him is high. I sent you a private message.
The Rural Alberta Advantage Hometowns
Voto:
Alright, so first I listen. Is the NMH album you mentioned before or after the airplane? I've never listened to OTM; I've been told they resemble Animal Collective a bit (whom I don't like). What do you say, Frank Black?
Michail Bakunin Stato e anarchia
Voto:
Franci: I read the nonsense from Skeletron, for example. I've gotten worse, huh? Anyway: Bakunin is an obviously outdated author, just as his ideas are outdated. They need to be contextualized within a specific historical period. That a fifteen-year-old reads him is fair, it's a good and right thing, for goodness' sake. It shows curiosity and open-mindedness. But it ends there. It doesn’t improve the world. If someone approaches anarchism to study its philosophical implications (not political ones, since those, as mentioned, are anachronistic and unfeasible), it’s much better to read an author like Max Stirner from the individualist strain. That could be useful in improving people's ideas. Definitely not Bakunin.
Michail Bakunin Stato e anarchia
Voto:
So, aside from the fact that reviewing a book by Bakunin in 2009 has the same political value as a refined discussion on Alexander the Great, and in this regard, dear Franci, regarding your quote "Fundamental writing - but not the only one - for those who want to start thinking about a 'different' world," I feel inclined to tell you: bullshit. Good for fifteen-year-olds. In fact, I was reading Bakunin at that age. As for the rest, I feel the need to argue with the reviewer about... well, yes, I mean to say... CAGATI IN PETTO DELORÈ. YOU'VE BROKEN MY BALLS. SKELETRON: so nice to reread you! go fuck yourself!
The Rural Alberta Advantage Hometowns
Voto:
"The purpose of this group is to provide comfort to those who have devoured Neutral Milk Hotel and are tired of eating leftovers." Here I am, yes yes. What are they called? Written. Although I didn't even eat leftovers. I got off the plane over the sea and stayed dazed for days. How beautiful it was, being on the plane. That was enough for me. Without leftovers, I mean. Do you say they resemble? Should I trust? Should I buy? Even, should I buy??? Okay.
The Cure The Head on the Door
Voto:
@Daedal: definitely more focused than Kiss Me, I agree with you there. But when it comes to the cornerstone of '80s production, well, it has to be "Disintegration," not this. In fact, Disintegration is the absolute peak. An iconic album. Then, as you rightly say, these are just opinions. bye
The Cure The Head on the Door
Voto:
Good review, although for me this album can be defined as "transitional": “never redundant or diffuse”? Instead, I believe these two adjectives describe it perfectly... de gustibus.
Enrico Rava The Pilgrim and the Stars
Voto:
5 loquats to you!