Yosif

Ah, so now you have to be a metalhead to give a 1 to an album? Please. The fact that I reviewed those 14 records doesn’t mean I only listen to those! The genres I listen to are listed in my profile, and I have all the skills necessary to give a 1 to a terrible band of that kind. At least I listen before evaluating (which is not what various random-placement folks do). I couldn't care less about the cheesy R&B, hoppers, and the like; they can all drop dead for all I care. I think I’ve said multiple times that every little label in music feels too tight for me (which is, in fact, the essence of every genre and sub-genre. METAL, the most standardized and closed among existing genres, both in terms of look and themes, and especially musically).
Just as you can tell me I don’t play guitar, I can tell you that producing certain electronic music (and playing other stuff, not your beloved guitar) requires particular skills too, something that usually younger metalheads don’t understand, immediately labeling everything with the classic phrase ("music with a computer key"). [And yet they give 5s to geniuses like Daft Punk, Jarre, Massive Attack, Portishead, and the like, who are in fact 100% electronic-synthesizer addicted productions. The very act of programming a synth to achieve a certain sound you have in your head (not limited by instruments like the guitar) requires preparation and technical skills, and a knowledge of sound synthesis, oscillators, waves, etc.) I’m sorry, but your comment is totally out of place, and not just a little bit; moreover, it's unusual since you are one of the more reasonable and open-minded ones here. You need to know your stuff before issuing judgments.] This genre doesn’t make sense; it’s everything but music. Listen carefully to the tracks from the space (without skipping). As for point 8, you misunderstand; I said (more than once) that I might like that particular super-fast genre because it’s chaotic, and I thought it could appeal to someone who listens to this other genre like the reviewed record, which is why I’m profiling it, because otherwise, these 5s can’t be explained at all. Because in terms of musical content, this stuff is worth no more than one or zero. Questioning someone like Vig is madness. Even more so for me. All of this can be summarized by the reviews of people who have given 5 to Misantropo a senso unico, or Tomb of the Mutilated, to name a couple, two of the most pointless records I've ever heard for the musical factor (for the lyrics, superb at least the first one, nothing to say). Scores must be given objectively, you know. Finally, I quote comment 11! Regards, Yosif.

mmm, are you sure about speedcore? just so you know, speed travels at speeds much higher than brutal grind, etc. anyway, I'm trying to get it. :)

Nice review. But did you give it to your sister or did you get it for yourself? Let me know! I hope it’s the first option :D
Anyway: infinite sampling exaggerations, some of Timbo's productions are objectively well-structured (even if this time not as successful as usual). I confirm about the little star, I heard it when it came out, just out of curiosity since the first album (the one that’s half R&B from 2001, if I remember correctly) wasn’t bad when it wasn’t that commercial yet. Then it gradually dropped to scandalous levels, I would say. I found this album terrible and as irritating as the singer himself. Another note, this isn’t "truzza" stuff, just because it’s uptempo in 4/4 doesn’t mean it has to be "truzza" (and this term you used makes me think you’re the classic close-minded one when it comes to electronic music). Absolutely avoidable listening.

Anyway, you're right, I listen to some excessively noisy genres too (even stuff at 3000, 4000 bpm like splittercore by Pengo) and I actually like them... but just because I appreciate chaos, and noisy things always have their charm, even if it’s just a kick looped for 3 minutes at 2000 bpm, but maybe with nice elaborations behind, devastating noise accompaniment, etc. But it’s obvious that no matter how silly and enjoyable they might be, they can never be a 5... and these grind things, I just can’t stand them, there’s the usual idiot with the growl, a dirty sound that’s pretty tedious, other losers strumming the guitar with the same 4 chords repeated endlessly. Lyrics that make no sense at all. Titles and covers that are pseudo-brutal just to create some scene, albums that last 20 minutes, what’s so great about that?

I will miss you.

Sorry if I'll be away from debaser for a while, but I'm going to build a statue for the great Stoney :D

I quote Stoney. In this genre, only the titles are interesting, I heard something in the space, I wouldn't dare to comment, 5 stars for a grindcore thing is F.O.L.L.I.A.

bring me the horizon

-3- but if you were the first to make jokes like that about the Bring Me The Horizon review!
Then coming from someone born in '92, it's a bit funny, huh? ;D

beastly growl? deathcore? Just reading this doesn't entice me, but I see there's also an electronic influence, so it could be interesting. Come on, I want to be fair; despite my disdain for these brutal things, I will listen and give an objective judgment. I hope it’s not lackluster like every time I pushed myself to listen to them.
P.S.: But what does gabber have to do with the genres?