Yosif

DeRank : 1,70
DeAge™ : 6422 days • Here since 10 november 2008
Alessandro Manzoni I promessi sposi
Voto:
I'm as healthy as a fish, but my gills hurt.
Alessandro Manzoni I promessi sposi
Voto:
If I let out a violent fart, does it become post-hardcore? (CIT.)
Alessandro Manzoni I promessi sposi
Voto:
MAD INTER AMALA!
Alessandro Manzoni I promessi sposi
Voto:
KAKA PRETE
Alessandro Manzoni I promessi sposi
Voto:
SQUALOR MILAN THEATRE BERLUSCONI
Kruder and Dorfmeister The K & D Sessions
Voto:
spectacular
Have A Nice Life Deathconsciousness
Voto:
overrated record. I found it almost embarrassingly boring/lacking.
Butch Hartman The Fairy OddParents (Due Fantagenitori)
Voto:
come on... pitiful and very clichéd.
Stadio La Faccia delle Donne
Voto:
I've never liked or tolerated this group, much like a large part of Italian pop, but I find it ridiculous that the general tendency is to give a random score of 1 (and this doesn't apply only to this review), when it is clear that A - the album hasn't even been listened to B - the same people in question give 5 to pathetic grindcore, brutal albums, etc. C - they assign double 5s to reviews of great artists (like Hendrix, who is undeniably great) but often without even looking at the title of the work or reading the review text, evaluating solely based on the criteria NAME / HISTORICAL RELEVANCE (which fundamentally contradicts the very concept of a REVIEW) D - they give 5 to highly questionable avant-gardisms like Cage's 4.33 (brilliant as you like, gentlemen, great idea, but for heaven's sake, it's still silence we're dealing with, far from downpours of 5) E - they talk about commerciality when the heavy bands they listen to are in rotation on Headbanger's Ball. F - they assign scores based on personal likes/dislikes. Of course, this is not only referring to the review in question or any particular user, but it's a general picture of the typical 1-giver and the nonsensical voting criteria typical of several users circulating here (and in this regard, well, some names are clear, like il migliore (and his fakes), xyz (a 17-year-old and I've said enough) are the first that come to mind). As for the Stadio, well, from what I've heard (not much), I've always found them cloying and trivial, but I don't own the album in question so I see no reason to vote. Of course, such exclamatory and celebratory tones for them seem exaggerated to me, but the review is well written and that's what counts. As for certain users, like Tanz, Blazer, and others who in every review they publish (whether it’s trash or masterpieces) go through the usual chaos of flames, anonymous posts, fakes, "battles," and personal disputes (usually only 10% of comments concern the album itself), I don’t understand how they can still get upset over the average, comments, rank, or whatever, when it's just simple comments on the web. I've also had my disputes but I don't see why getting upset or why getting annoyed if the average or rank drops. Do you care that much? The mass is over, amen. Yosif
Marta Topferova Flor Nocturna
Voto:
Certo! Inviami il testo e procederò con la traduzione.