telespallabob

Good review, interesting collection but not perfect.

Majestic reception in size. Conclusions in 4 lines, a bit strange. Apart from that, I noticed one thing: you introduced the supposed four elements of music, but you just threw it out there and then didn’t follow it up. You started with a completely different discourse, very interesting and well presented. The final judgment? In my opinion, positive but not 5 stars.

The writing of value, I don't know the group.

I agree with Giona about the review. When I first started listening to them, they didn’t speak very highly of this album, so I approached it skeptically. However, I’ve always found it to be a good piece of work.

Great review, even if it's slightly long.

Great Jonah, the book is nice but I prefer other works by Dickens.

Can you review books? Here we go! I have so many to describe, I can't wait. In my high school newspaper, I had a dedicated column; I will continue it online.

A good review, of value

A nice proposal, I will look for them.

I believe it's time for the acknowledgments that go to everyone. @Hell and Icnarf, I try to have no prejudices of any kind. This way, I present albums that are as varied as possible. Naturally, my preferences lead me in a certain direction. @Defender85, when I mentioned stylistic peak, I meant a pinnacle in the execution of the tracks, so regarding the characteristic style of the group and the album. That's why I used that definition which, objectively, can lead to misunderstandings. @Fritz, the underlying idea that DeFeis has in mind is an analysis of the relationship between man and divinity, and it concerns all three concepts. So we have the two parts of Marriage that do not faithfully replicate the book but have references to Blake (that's how I've always known it). As for Invictus, I knew that the theme of the album was linked to the figure of Caesar and his military exploits. Moreover, I had read this information elsewhere, which is why I cited it. The fact that it is not true (at least that's what you said, and until proven otherwise, you are right) constitutes a personal mistake and a gap of knowledge on my part, for which I ask for forgiveness from those who will read the review. @Cla, Metal is an extremely varied macro-genre, and I believe this is hard to deny (one proof is given by the continuous definitions that are provided when describing certain albums, even here on Debaser. You can also consult the list of DeGeneri); the fact that it is original is a personal judgment, which may logically not be shared by the reader, and this falls within a normal dialectic between two subjects. @Aliosha, the answer to the question should have been included in the previous sentences, particularly in the response to Fritz.