telespallabob

Ah, right. I was forgetting to rate the album.

Welcome to Debaser. A review that’s too long; it’s clear you write well and with passion, but cut it down a bit. P.S. Sorry for the question: if this is the third album, shouldn’t it be called Faust III, or am I wrong? (like Focus did by naming their third LP "Focus III") The answer to the mystery is called "The Faust Tapes," which is the band's third studio album.

The vote on the review exists as an emblematic element, indeed. Send them to Bomba (always of this caliber).

Welcome to Debaser, that’s all I can say. The review itself leaves me speechless.

Gustavo hit the nail on the head: anyone who doesn't have this record MUST get it. Essential.

I haven't listened to him in a while, but I remember he was as ugly as hunger.

If the reaction that this review is supposed to evoke at the end of the reading is a hearty laugh, then in my case, the goal has been achieved.

@Vortex, Theoretically it shouldn't be the case, but it's well-known how much negative commentary has been made about this album, regarding the absence of Cale or its lesser value compared to those that preceded it. So we can also expect a real denial of the musical Trinity you were talking about.

My relationship with the Velvet Underground comes from a sort of paradox: I started with this album and then went backwards. Only later did I find myself with the "banana" in my hands. Therefore, there’s a kind of emotional bond with this album, even if it might be better to talk about Reed's first work plus a series of """""turnisti""""" (let's put that in quotes). Now let's move on to the review (Welcome to Debaser to the reviewer): decent with some interesting elements of analysis (First work of Noise-Rock? Could you elaborate on this thesis?), we’ll see what you can do with something that is unpublished (I mean in terms of reviews).

I didn't want to make 90 just to see them in Milan; anyway, I'll take note of these.