cptgaio

See dear Alessio, I really don't care when you say "do you believe the first one who comes along and tells you something? It depends. It depends on who’s telling me" because in this case, I have confirmed that the person telling me is based on solid scientific principles (not all of us are like you, who open your mouth only to shoot judgments without the slightest source) and I recommend you take a look at their website (look for it, you have the name, no links as we said) who knows, you might learn something. I care more when you say "if I feel like listening." because this, even if the other nonsense you’ve spouted over the years weren't enough, qualifies you for what you are (post 74). That said, I kindly ask you not to disturb the site administrators too much with your usual endless complaints (in this case) about the content of the same post (from the change in attitude I see a long straw tail) I also wish you a great and cheerful day.

I quote a phrase by Paolo Attivissimo: "Some supporters of conspiracy theories claim that there were no Jews among the victims of the World Trade Center attacks. Consequently, they say, the Jews must have been warned; and if they were warned, it means that behind the attacks there is a hand different from that proposed by the official version.
Those who make this claim often cite as "evidence" the official list of the WTC attack victims, available for example from CNN, which does not list any Israelis among the occupants of the World Trade Center: the only Israeli who died at the WTC was a passenger on flight 175.
The claim is false for the simple fact that Israeli and Jew are not synonyms.
One can be Jewish without necessarily being Israeli, just as one can be Catholic without necessarily being Italian. This fact should be so well-known and obvious that anyone who makes the statement "no Israelis, therefore no Jews, died at the World Trade Center" is either acting in bad faith or is ignorant.
The list of victims does not group them by religion, so from this list it is impossible to know how many Jews perished at the WTC.
Moreover, using this type of "reasoning," one could "prove" that the attacks were the work of Italians. Notice this: no Italians appear on the list of victims. Why doesn’t this raise suspicions, while the apparent absence of Jews does?"

As before, me. Clearly, someone else has not changed their tone.

I don't know many things, but one thing I know for sure is that you don't know a damn thing; you're just a kid playing the provocateur. You haven't been banned yet because your (simple and populist) provocations bring in "high numbers": you act alternative but you've become the site's whore; that's a fact. How does it feel? Regards.

Oh God, now he's a conspiracy theorist too... that was the only thing missing from the list...

Thank you very much ;-)

I think so too, but besides the fact that it still offers high-level performances, I believe that the (superior) quality of the Montreux recordings significantly impacts it. Then, there are many other variables to consider, including the 13-14 years of difference, the 500+ additional concerts under his belt, and the fact that these bootleg recordings were made during longer tours (both in terms of dates and individual performances: longer repertoire = longer concerts. He went from a bit over an hour in '92 to over two hours by the late '90s and early 2000s) and therefore the Red One had to preserve his voice more carefully compared to the live performances in Montreux (especially that of '91 if I’m not mistaken, which took place during a break period). But aside from everything, I still like them anyway ;-)

Grotesque and unattainable. Bosch another fucking genius.

Following Mr. S.C.'s review, I listened here and there and I have to say I was quite disappointed, bored instead of...de gustibus anyway.

Great Book @Geenoo More than "Into Thin Air" by the cunning Krakauer about that story, I would recommend "Everest 1996: The Climb" by Anatolij Nikolaevic Bukreev and Gary Weston DeWalt.