Logic Probe

Thank you. A piece of advice, Marko, clear your mind of what you've already heard and let yourself be carried away by the story. Have a good journey and enjoy the Liga :)

It is, of course, my very personal opinion that certain albums harm Italian music. Why? Because they are too easy to listen to, because they take just enough and do not push towards something absolutely more substantial. Liga does what he knows how to do (the lyricist and guitar strummer), the band refines the musical emptiness that revolves around simple chords and not much else. We have screamed for a true Italian rocker and sacrificed him at the altar of business. Liga is a well-packaged commercial operation. That doesn’t mean he shouldn't be liked, in fact, but be careful when talking about masterpieces. In other words, I have no doubt that Liga can convey emotions, but let’s not turn them into seminal albums. Making this kind of music is far too simple. Personally, I appreciate those who try to produce true "works." Marco, try to read my review on Sig V. Try listening to them; perhaps you could discover an unseen Italy, made of grit, imagination, and also a lot of intellectual substance. It’s just a suggestion... fate vobis. :) With affection, LOGIC PS: I don't feel like voting for an album that communicates nothing to me (I will eternally be in doubt over the fact that it’s probably me who does not understand it).

stunning album. S.T.U.P.E.N.D.O. I adore Ferretti, never mundane, always a keen observer of a human being in "search of an author," attentive to the personal and the social. It may not appeal to everyone, it may resemble nosferatu, but God, what intelligence that man has. 5, 5 and again 5 :)

You don't understand me, Luca. I'm not attacking you. I just want to understand what certain statements are based on... thrown out there without a shadow of a doubt (it seems like an absolute rule). They seem somewhat like catchphrases to close a discussion rather than to start one. There’s no modesty in my veins; you should know me to say that (and from a small epistle, you cannot draw such a conclusion). I just asked a question and I’d like to think it through. Many people make that statement, and I want to understand what drives you to assert something like that. Luca, I believe that those who express their thoughts are doing something different from "being bitter." Your statement can, however, be interpreted the other way around (that is, you are bitter about comments contrary to your opinion). But even this, if you think about it, makes little sense. The point is: I like the album for this reason and I don't like it for that other reason. I'm not upset with you (believe me), it's that unfortunate statement that gets me riled up. Ciauz :)

Just one question that keeps spinning in my mind (to be directed at Luca Primiballi) and I can't wrap my head around: why should someone who doesn't like a successful Italian artist feel bitter about the career that said artist has had? In other words, what does this statement mean? Very often in the comments about Cremonini and Vasco, this comment pops up. But what sense does it make? What sense does it make to feel bitter about a singer's success? Why are you so sure that people hate those who are successful? Personally, I find Ligabue the death of Italian rock, but that doesn’t make me bitter! I simply listen to other Italian music, more meaningful and fulfilling. If you like Liga, I’m happy for you. That doesn’t mean I’ll judge you as fools! Seriously, guys, let’s not talk nonsense. Ciauz.

That ending, Hal, I find unbearable. Halfway between Popeye and the old man from the American Wild West. Nothing to do with the ending of the first episode.

I'm sorry to see you go, Santa :). I'm responding to the violence of putting the "velline" on display (always for Caz :D). The violence arises from the fact that young and impressionable girls (though, in the end, we’re all impressionable) see the "velline" as a goal and a realization of their lives. This creates a subculture, and the message contained within it is: you're beautiful, you're valuable; you're ugly, you're marginalized. Just think about the relationship between girls and the infamous mirror. If the equation is: realization:beauty = me:vellina, then a distortion of a possible reality has been generated. But this distortion, perpetuated by TV, newspapers, and posters, becomes culture (think of art: Botticelli doesn't depict skinny women, but rather curvy ones; that was the standard of beauty). These perverse cultures prey on feelings of inadequacy in human beings, turning them into victims (read aggressive or submissive) of their daily lives. The failure to achieve personal satisfaction generates a "metropolitan nightmare" that often cannot be remedied. This is the digital violence related to the "velline." Bye and sorry if I rambled on. Logic

Come on Santa, don’t speak in the plural; it makes me laugh too much :D. That’s exactly the point you’ve just focused on. You say it yourself. Violence is also in showing the models with their butts out (not that I mind, of course... I’m just saying this for fun :) ), because it’s precisely from information that a behavioral response is created. I’m not paranoid, Santa. The twentieth century is the century of psychological disorders. People feel discomfort, contemplate change without finding answers. In this period of “information” orgy, either you grow mentally or you lose yourself in oblivion. It has become difficult to read in context, and often what appears is not as it is perceived (and here I connect to CCCP). You see, Santa, religion uses mass media (Wojtyla was a splendid example). By using the media, one can influence and condition those who live off television (think about what is offered to our elderly as an alternative to TV, for example). The world boxed in within it envelops you in a pseudo-communication that isn’t communication (because it is a monologue). And yet there is a response! These means are used, Santa (and I’m not saying that the Church itself is malevolent), for political, commercial, religious purposes and so on. With them, good cheer is instilled; with them, hatred is instilled. I do not doubt what your “sacred self” feels; I doubt the action and human interpretation of the sacred, how this interpretation can create culture, what this culture appeals to and decrees. I’ll finish with a metaphor: the eye sees what is in front of it, that is, what light refracts, not what is in the middle. Logic.

Seriously? Was it a bat? Well, it's safe to say I scored an own goal!!! Wow, what an embarrassing moment..... :P Forget I said anything :)

noooooooooooooooooooo kosmoooooooooooooooooooooooooo you can't do this to me. please please pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeee. :)