DaveJonGilmour

DeRank ™: 1,09

DeAge™ : 7258 days • Here since 29 july 2006

Vasco Rossi Non Siamo Mica Gli Americani

28 nov 06

Voto:

The review sucks, both for the rating given to the pseudo-character in the photo and for the enormous bullshit that has now become typical of Polletti, and because it’s sooooo heavy, and because the last sentence is rather annoying. Here’s the thing: if there's one thing it does exceptionally well, it's irritating. Oh, I almost forgot, the review sucks just like the album. Nothing more, nothing less.

Pink Floyd Atom Heart Mother

28 nov 06

Voto:

But maybe when I voted in the previous post I was feeling unwell...

Frank Zappa Sheik Yerbouti

28 nov 06

Voto:

I completely agree with the first post by fusillo, and I also don't like the way the review is structured.

Fabrizio De André Vol.3

28 nov 06

Voto:

The grammar first, a polè, and then De Andrè.

Francesco De Gregori Alice non lo sa

28 nov 06

Voto:

Wow, I and Anderson met on the review of Poletti... it could also be referred to as a forum... subject to the reviewer’s approval, of course.

Bob Marley Exodus

28 nov 06

Voto:

Poletti, but really, like Bob, are you into THC? (I'm waiting for a response that’s at least sensible, if not intelligent.)

The Beatles The Beatles Collection (16 CD)

28 nov 06

Voto:

Well, aside from a few grammar mistakes, a few wrong titles, a few incorrect dates, a few nonsense bits here and there, some bold surveys, a bit of confusing punctuation, some questionable ratings, a few more nonsense bits here and there, a few tedious statements, some improper quotes, and definitely a few other things, overall, it's not bad.

Bisio E Le Storie Tese E Elio Live in Mantova - luglio 2006

28 nov 06

Voto:

Could it have been a comment from the editors?

Limbonic Art In Abhorrence Dementia

28 nov 06

Voto:

What the hell did I write? I hope it makes sense!

Limbonic Art In Abhorrence Dementia

28 nov 06

Voto:

I'm not quite getting the point... I can say that in some of my reviews I've made things bold by my own choice, and the editors have also made other things bold, highlighting things like "1997," which I believe are not essential for conveying the meaning one would want to give to a "bolded" term. From what I can tell, even in this review, there is still a tendency to highlight the year and the musical genres mentioned in the review, and then some other things (what?) at the discretion of the editor(s) on duty. At least, that's my impression...