Saputello

"technique and inspiration just for the speech you’re making tend, in some way, to merge"----> You’ve hit on one of the key points!!! Instinct and compositional expertise united together...

I don't agree with that: the spark of inspiration doesn't come from nowhere, unfortunately. However, there are those who are predisposed to have it as a mental circuit.

Sorry, unfortunately I haven't learned how to lift the skirts of the debaserian to see if they are male or female. Of course, you can express your opinion. And I above expressed my opinion on your opinion. Did I position myself incorrectly? Then sorry, sometimes I'm too energetic in expressing my viewpoints. Hi BellA!

It's amazing how the listener's ear can sometimes perceive how inspired a composition is. You can feel when a composition has a certain compositional freshness and when, instead, it is academic—that is cold!!

To achieve this status of creativity (which theoretically anyone could reach), one must be aware of their abilities, be focused, and have dealt with music in a natural and instinctive manner, as well as in a didactic way. This is why the ear is extremely important; it is an instinctive bridge between the musician and the music.

It's very difficult to describe the compositional process of the artist regular; now I’ll try to explain it to you: it’s strange because the artist, while composing, relies on all their knowledge and listening experiences, but in the creative moment, they are simultaneously able to detach from it and not think of any preconceived constructs. One must be infinitely technical but also be able to surrender to inspiration. Do you understand?

In my opinion, no regular, or at least not in the purely compositional moment.

Five to Cimabue, a great painter! One to the reviewer who misspelled the name.

I have begun to doubt that you might be brain-damaged.

It is also not possible to write decent music without appropriate preparation in every field. Today, specialization does not serve musical progress; niche genres are a gratification for a select few. And then a composer, I think, must have maximum concentration that today is unattainable. You cannot write interesting things if in the meantime you have to do a university master's degree. You cannot expect to be a genius if no one supports and promotes you. You cannot believe you have the insights by dedicating 10 minutes a day. This concentration and support are largely missing. Even when there are good ideas, they are buried by a myriad of bands that propose music solely to break through (the balls), a pre-constructed, non-instinctive, predictable music. Punk-pop, rock-pop, prog-metal, etc. When a band starts making its own music, it immediately feels the need to limit itself to mimicking the rhetoric of a limited genre; it fears not having an identity and not being liked, so it conforms to infinitely restrictive brands. The thing I hate most is listening to those bands made up of musicians steeped in instrumental technique who churn out this bland, superficial song, devoted to easy listening, but which is praised among connoisseurs because “the drummer is a metronome, damn it,” “the guitarist, listen to that sound,” “the keyboardist fits in with style and calm.” But fuck that. And fuck those musicians who now care more about production and sound at the expense of composition.