trellheim

DeRank : 11,85
DeAge™ : 8037 days • Here since 8 june 2004
Alexander Tucker Portal
Voto:
The name is haunting, musically no. But I doubt it's your kind of thing. But The Pyramids (not to be confused with just Pyramids, which are rubbish)? Side project of the Archie Bronson Outfit... they're nice...
McLusky McLusky Do Dallas
Voto:
Cla, the video unfortunately isn't theirs. Love them like crazy anyway.
Alexander Tucker Portal
Voto:
I Religious Knives are noise/psych-droney, Head of Wantastiquet is a guy with a banjo, pretty desolate but not bad. And then there's the new one from Matt Elliott, but it seems like his usual stuff and doesn't excite me. It's all you-know-where.
Alexander Tucker Portal
Voto:
But Pitchfork IS a den of idiots. Repeated listens: Head of Wantastiquet, Religious Knives, White Hills (seen live and really powerful). Nice Cloudland Canyon and The Alps... I think I had dismissed Crystal Antlers a while ago. Did I make a mistake?
McLusky McLusky Do Dallas
Voto:
Talking about Lightsabre Cocksucking Blues is always a great opportunity to remember this incredibly funny video, which I think perfectly captures the spirit of the song: Sweary Kittens | all other songs | Songs
McLusky McLusky Do Dallas
Voto:
"We take more drugs than a touring funk band," then it's a quote from the comedian (uhm, better stand-up comedian) Bill Hicks, who died of liver cancer in '94. Unlucky band? I wouldn’t say so, they still have quite a following afterward. Disbanded without much fuss? Not really, they left legions of fans in deep despair. Besides the Future of the Left, there are also the Shooting at Unarmed Men, from former bassist Jon Chapple. But of course, Falco and the FOTL are on another level.
Alexander Tucker Portal
Voto:
You finally did it, huh? You had been talking about it for months. Unfortunately, he didn't get me at all. He reminds me of Richard Youngs but with less psychedelia.
Roberto Saviano Gomorra. Viaggio nell'impero economico e nel sogno di dominio della camorra.
Voto:
So let's settle this: 1) I don't hide behind anyone; 2) it's not me who discards the reviews but the editors in agreement (everyone has their say, the rule is that if at least one editor is in favor of publication, then it gets published); 3) it seems to me that you have a problem with me, also because that's what you say around, but if you don't then all the better. That said: farewell.
Roberto Saviano Gomorra. Viaggio nell'impero economico e nel sogno di dominio della camorra.
Voto:
So talk to me! Take it out on me! But cut it out with this story, have the guts to come to me and tell me what your fucking problem is, something you've never done so far.
Roberto Saviano Gomorra. Viaggio nell'impero economico e nel sogno di dominio della camorra.
Voto:
The difference is that you insult me and the entire staff, based on things you shouldn't even know, of which someone informed you. A person you've already discredited, but now you pretend you don't want to discredit. I have no problem telling you that I don't like you; I wasn't interested in doing it, but do I have to do it publicly? I do. The fact is, though, you are treated like any other user. Both when you leave enabled anonymous comments (something you never do) on purpose to vent in vulgarity, and when you send pointless reviews that don't deserve to be published. Oh, because then you also go and recommend yourself to Nick to intercede with someone and ensure that your reviews get published. And then I'm not the one deciding whether the reviews get published or not. So stop with your stories about Freemasonry and private messages "otherwise someone will get hurt." See? It's all out in the open.