pretazzo

DeRank : 3,14
DeAge™ : 7375 days • Here since 2 april 2006
Minor Threat Minor Threat
Voto:
The White Zombie? Metal, I think...
Kon Ichikawa L'arpa birmana
Voto:
the review is a bit heavy, the movie is beautiful
Minor Threat Minor Threat
Voto:
I’ve only heard the White Zombie mentioned, I’ll try to listen to that album.
Minor Threat Minor Threat
Voto:
professional critics don’t exist
Minor Threat Minor Threat
Voto:
unless one decides to remain in pure anecdote, but at that point what a pain in the ass...
Minor Threat Minor Threat
Voto:
In my opinion, when reviewing an album (or discussing music), it is practically impossible to avoid having a "critical" attitude.
Minor Threat Minor Threat
Voto:
@ramona: "let's just listen" <<< so what are we doing on debaser?
Samuel Fuller Shock Corridor
Voto:
beautiful movie, Fuller was a genius! great job Cheri, excellent review!
Tangerine Dream Ricochet
Voto:
Zion, German artist??? I didn't know that... I was actually referring to our legendary Zaione!! (whom I doubt will pass by here, because he hates the Tangenine) :-D
Minor Threat Minor Threat
Voto:
I, on the other hand, disagree. For me, among the many categorizations that are made, the one that distinguishes punk from hardcore is one of the least trivial. In my previous post, I emphasized the stylistic and geographical differences (differences that, with all the necessary distinctions, do not seem arbitrary at all); now I would like to add a conceptual (and thematic) difference that perhaps is the most relevant (as well as the most overlooked). Punk and hardcore emerged in two different contexts (the economically troubled England of the late 1970s; the Reaganite hedonism and yuppies of the early 1980s in the United States). The English punk bands were largely made up of people from the working class, and their audience consisted of underclass individuals, marginalized, unemployed, etc. On the other hand, hardcore developed primarily from high schools, thus belonging to the middle class. Consequently, the themes addressed (and, by extension, the mood) were largely different: punk focused almost exclusively on social and political themes, closely tied to the moment that English society was experiencing at the time, and their attitude was therefore angry, provocative, irreverent, filled with slogans and anarchic anthems… American hardcore, on the other hand, often added an existential, introverted, private, reflective component to this social aspect, which might have started from the acknowledgment of the ills of America at that time, but then ended up operating on more general reflections (to put it in Leopardi's terms, punk was based on historical pessimism, while hc was based on cosmic pessimism). So, it doesn’t seem like a minor difference to me. Unfortunately, the demonization of definitions (a very common hobby these days), the tendency to see "labels" everywhere, the abandonment of seeking the distinguishing traits of one genre compared to another, in my opinion, prevents a deeper understanding of certain musical and cultural phenomena of the past.