CycoCiccio

DeRank : 0,15
DeAge™ : 7455 days • Here since 11 january 2006
Audioslave Audioslave
Voto:
Vic sometimes (like all of us) makes mistakes too. But this time he got it right (insults aside). I was sorry that he got censored, but it’s far from me to make it a problem. Whoever manages this site, evidently to avoid issues, has RIGHTLY decided to censor. It's a shame because the piece, without the incriminated part, isn’t worth much. Turco, you didn’t correctly interpret my words: read it again more carefully, without distorting the meaning.
Audioslave Audioslave
Voto:
Yes aniel, the review completely veers away from musical topics. But most of theirs do. If the site's policy is to publish everything (as it seems to be), they should have published this too. The fact that they censored the jabs at gays and feminists clearly shows the veiled fear that each of us has today when it comes to confronting certain lobbies. The system works just like that: first, we fight for the sacred freedom, then we shift to trying to take down the next person (think of the Americans: first they freed us from Bolsheviks and fascists, now they're trying to dominate the world). Vic's "invectives" (perhaps unwittingly) perfectly illustrate this widespread trend seen throughout the West.
Audioslave Audioslave
Voto:
"Every time someone fights for equality, you can bet your ass and your left nut that what they really want is superiority (...) if you're a fucking faggot who does nothing to hide your condition as a anal-receptive cock, well, okay, you can have whatever the fuck you want (...) It’s the message we’re giving people nowadays, especially children." - Vic Sorriso - I saved some of his sacred words last night censored. Some thoughts are as sharp as they are dangerous... Long live Vic Sorriso.
Audioslave Audioslave
Voto:
"Every time someone fights for equality, you can bet your ass and your left ball that what they really want is superiority (...) if you're a fucking faggot who does nothing to hide his condition as a penile receptacle, well, okay, you can have all the fucking whatever you want (...) That’s the message we’re giving to people these days, especially to kids.ā€ I admit that the teasing of ā€œHeaven And Hellā€ irritated me quite a bit. Well Vic, this record isn’t that disgusting after all, but this time it’s you who has been truly brilliant.
Death SS The Story Of 1977/1984
Voto:
it's the truth.. why???
Black Sabbath Vol. 4
Voto:
mayhem, because this record is the "grandfather" of "Blues For The Red Sun" and "Welcome To Sky Valley," which are themselves milestones of stoner rock from the last decade. For example, just by listening to the sounds, you can understand where Chriss Goss "invented" the "low-fi" production. Well, you might find them tiresome, but without these songs, a lot of rock today would be different from what it is (or maybe it wouldn't exist at all, who can know). In over 30 years (I mean thirty), we’ve found ourselves repeatedly copying from "Vol.4"... that's why I’d say 5 instead of 4.
Yngwie J. Malmsteen's Rising Force Rising Force
Voto:
Alright, aside from the wrong cover... if the nickname doesn't lie, our reviewer isn't even 16 years old. Next time, read carefully before submitting the piece: pay attention to both punctuation and sentence structure. The first Malmsteen isn't that bloated and obscene, but if you write a poorly done review, you won't interest anyone (except those who already listen to it). Here, I’ll give you a 3, but it's just to encourage you.
Black Sabbath Vol. 4
Voto:
Hehe, be careful... to each their own... I suggest you immerse yourself in environments where form matters more than content. They're still reviews; you have to pay attention to what you say in addition to the "how." If you disparage pieces like "Cornucopia," "St. Vitus Dance," or "Tomorrows Dreams," then I’m forced to rate you poorly anyway.
Eros Ramazzotti In ogni senso
Voto:
Well, the idea of characters on the cover had already been done by Sabbath in '83...