JimMorrison

Well, more than the cover, I’d say they suck. The guy in the front row reminds me a lot of Uncle Pasqualino when he comes back from the countryside, and the one on our left would make a great cellmate for Riccardo il rosso, complete with snot on his nose. He smells dirty. The other two come off as fools, like a man who has just come out of the woods this morning or this evening.

Inside this world of hostility
Flying in the midst of a sky of freedom
Holding hands, united... This forced rhyme really makes me laugh... ahah... hostility, freedom, la! Oh my God, what have I missed...

This time I feel like disagreeing with what you say. It’s an alternative representation of an album that has a very clear and defined meaning, and I see nothing wrong if, while you’re listening to the music, representative images or effects flash before your eyes. I truly don’t grasp the meaning of your words…

Metalla', do you want an honest and straightforward opinion or should I cleverly disguise the reality with a loud, misleading, and destabilizing joke about the concept of the musicality of being? Because the matter is complex and not without a critique of the empty thoughts of an analyzing philosopher. And this is quite important for a musicologist who is a professional architect, although I prefer architettes. Aloha.

But funny enough, it's the same thing I think about you. When coincidences are mentioned... Thankfully, I expressed myself more regarding the book and not the film. As they say, "being a poletti."

<<<This was perfect.>>> Maybe saying perfect is too much, but certainly not a 2. The literary work, however, is a 5...

<<<I didn't have much fun>>> Maybe because it's neither a comedy nor a stand-up...

Three hours later, my eyes are wide open; it's not like I had that much fun. But then I decide to be patient; after all, a year passes quickly. And here I am again: big room, packed, beautiful. The cast is the same, the movie too. But after three hours, I have a strange feeling: was this Tolkien someone I was right to have never met? The following year, I don’t fall for it again. I stay home; I enjoy the last part from the comfort of my house. Too bad, it was the best.
I was reading another review where someone advised you to stick with the topic of "cinema." In my opinion, you're quite the bullshitter in this field too. You haven’t read Tolkien’s book because you probably wouldn’t be able to, but mostly I believe you have no idea what you are talking about. An author who not only put on paper a Fantasy work (and that's how you should see it) of inestimable value but also sparked a genre that, now more than ever, is receiving acclaim in terms of criticism and success. And I’m not talking about strictly easy-reading products. The mere fact that he created new languages is of incredible significance. He gave them a history, a background. Every term has its own etymology linked to a language development path. Look, I won’t go on because there truly are too many things to say. Go back to reading Harmony.
P.S.: Jackson may have made crap films before and after TLOTR (see King Kong), but he was perfect in this one.

Of course, the affection I have for you is immense, and to prove it, I vote for you as I should.

Pinko, I absolutely need to check that you have been unanimously nominated as a human case, it's crucial for the N.C.U.S.D. committee, otherwise we won't get any sleep tonight. I will open the consultations right away...