JimMorrison

DeRank : 3,31
DeAge™ : 7549 days • Here since 10 october 2005
Jane's Addiction Ritual De Lo Habitual
Voto:
I'll try to follow it, right! Until next time ;)
Jane's Addiction Ritual De Lo Habitual
Voto:
Donj, I really appreciated your response full of motivations and examples. However, the examples do not manage to sway my position for simple reasons: <<<but for instance, if you listen to the Panic Channel album (basically the last incarnation of Jane's after they kicked out Farrell), you realize that it doesn't work>>> --->>> See? Here you felt the same sensation I have for the Jane's, exactly the same. It's just another demonstration of something that doesn't work (for you), and I'm not talking about fixed patterns; maybe Farrell's voice would suit another band doing the same genre.
Depeche Mode The Best of
Voto:
As promised, I've tidied up the links, breath take a look and see if they work.
The Doors The Doors
Voto:
Of course, good Dave, read all the comments in this review and take note: every now and then there's someone who shoots off a judgment that's as random as a dog's cock, like the good Mike76 in the end. So, me and the know-it-all started the game: "You shoot one off right away and make it bigger." It's fun. ;)
Dragonauta CabraMacabra
Voto:
There are many reasons, dear ocram... Some are "commitments" to the site (and perhaps you know what I’m talking about), but the main reason is that I enjoy it, I enjoy writing reviews however I like, without having to answer to anyone, I like to comment, stir things up, discover new albums/genres/trends. There are many things, among the latest being getting to know you... :D
Dragonauta CabraMacabra
Voto:
<<<to know opinions, tastes, groups, people, maybe to have a laugh while respecting everyone and interacting with those I consider more knowledgeable than me (musically and personally)... I know... I said interact... but in the end, that’s what we’re doing right now too... Ps: for this time, I won't tell you to fuck off either... :-P>>> And that's all there is, my dear ocram, if you want to read standard reviews and that’s it, you’ll find loads of them all over the web, LiveCity, Scaruffi, OndaRock... this is DeBaser, a ring where we can tell each other to fuck off while talking about records, where you can write reviews however the hell you want, even standard ones, why not. If we had to take your reasoning into account, half of the reviews would end up as literary cases.
Dragonauta CabraMacabra
Voto:
Too stoner, the accompanying images are always brilliant. Do you remember the one with Archimedes and the brilliant idea? :D
Dragonauta CabraMacabra
Voto:
<<<It would be enough for the "known" users of the site to write a meager list of albums to listen to. period... without the need for reviews, the trust would come from the experience and knowledge of the users>>> Well, the knowledge among users is built day by day, tastes, ways of thinking, and trends evolve. If you make a list, you don't create interaction; the posts under the reviews do. For example, caz has gone through the rock period, the proggoso period, the rap period, the indie period, the menstrual period. And each time he presented albums from that specific period. Maybe if he had written about Gentle Giant, it wouldn’t have turned into something nice. I'll say goodbye too...
The Doors The Doors
Voto:
Dave, you forgot to shoot a bullshit too; it's the game of the day, shooting a bullshit while trying in every way to make it sound true... Let me give you an example: the Doors were the first boy band to use synthesizers instead of Korg keyboards with floppy disks.