sfascia carrozze

DeRank : 39,03
DeAge™ : 7565 days • Here since 25 september 2005
Beck Mellow Gold
Voto:
Kind de-reviewing Monsieur ringoStarFish, Life is short, art is long, opportunity fleeting, hazardous experiment, difficult judgment. Sincerely. Your S.C. of (dis)trust.
Eric Clapton Unplugged
Voto:
Dearest de-replicators (almost from the unanimous thought-form) Monsieurs Jim Morrison and Aniel, I have NEVER questioned the SUBJECTIVITY of your noble de-comments (and who am I to do so?) in relation to the Claptonesque (well written, just to make it clear) de-review. Moreover, the much-maligned DE GUSTIBUS (in the event of a breakdown) is always at the foundation of any consideration. I would pose, aside (great Prince De Curtis) from the ejected from the chee-dee in question, more than anything an "ethical" (madness?) problem regarding the de-reviewed (fake) record: no one dares to question the crystalline class (de gustibus) of the performer in question, but honestly, these (I repeat) glassy and aseptic (the applause on demand/payment by the kilo, I would set aside..) "live" performances, according to the miserable wheel-barrow man of three thalers, are leaking (not Clapton, specifically) from all sides and above all do not serve the art (musical) in general or the performers themselves well. Furthermore, dear Monsieur Aniel, why shouldn’t I express my personal critical de-comment (I don't think I'm offending anyone.. it's just an opinion among many) in relation to the de-reviews of artists not particularly smashingly appreciated/hailed? From my point of view, it is pleasant when one manages to establish and open (thanks also to a "normal" de-review) a respectful constructive comparison on any (musical) argument, don’t you think? Yours cordially to both and even more so. Your s.C. of (d)trust. p.s. I will try to listen to this blessed record, so that I can argue critically in a more fruitful manner.
Murcof Remembranza
Voto:
Dear de-reviewer Monsieur Gabbox, a very intriguing and curiosity-arousing review for what seems to be a rather disorienting and conceptually significant album. As for the so-called "collapse of the social system," I believe that "we" are already quite enough of it (for those who "want" to see it... if one prefers to stroll around with classic ham slices pasted over their eyeballs, then that’s really a whole different kettle of fish...) more than mere witnesses: an album narrating contemporaneity, indeed, and not for a (im)probable near future. Around here, the dust has been kicked up nicely for quite some time now... Warmest regards.
Your S.C. of (dis)trust.
Eric Clapton Unplugged
Voto:
A true delight for the ears, they say... but then the sacrosanct de gustibus would go irreparably down the drain, wouldn’t you agree? The "problem" (so to speak) lies in the fact that the mephitic wrecking ball from three thalers doesn't really appreciate Mr. Slowhand's work... let alone in the MTV (let’s be nice) AN-PLAGGHD version: if I really had to entertain myself with Uncle Eric live, I would much prefer a battered (which surely exists..) and "real" Peel Session than the (phony) cozy/applauding theater mentioned above. De Gustibus (part 123.985). That said, it doesn't take away from the fact that for the de-reviewer Monsieur Morrison and you, dear de-commentator Mr. Aniel (whom I absolutely respect, just to avoid misunderstandings), this is an indispensable and unavoidable work. A nos bidere cun saluri. Your S.C. of (s)trength.
Eric Clapton Unplugged
Voto:
Dear de-reviewer Monsieur JimMorrison, honestly I must say that upon seeing your new de-review in the (unfortunate) De-Baser index, I awaited and hoped for the new opportunity to proto-read a new and wonderful Pindaric/onomatopoeic tribute album... I was increasingly disappointed, I confess candidly. (And who cares, besides being the best "Cuore" magazine, don't you want to add that?) Frankly (like the Van Morrison album), I am not familiar with the de-reviewed album (it has passed through my hands more than once... but I never gave it any importance): in general, I have been/am/will always be quite skeptical of the MTV Unplugged "politics," contexts that I see as a bit too glassy and aseptic... however, from what I read, the Clapton-acoustic approach works pretty well. Cordial regards in abundance. Your Clio Strangler of (in)trust.
Hate Forest Purity
Voto:
Uh.. forgive the mistake, I meant to say: "Kind de-reviewer Monsieur HAB" (not Hal).
Hate Forest Purity
Voto:
Dear de-reviewer Monsieur Hal, this rather "transported" de-commentation truly evokes (having been an ardent admirer of metal/excesses in music) nearly immediate research instincts. Reading the obvious de-references (musical) imbued in Your de-comment, I also wonder (not being familiar with the record and the ascetic combo in question) whether one can genuinely argue about "innovation" in this realm: by its very nature, this is the classic de-generate widely unsuitable (except for miraculous works...) for any progressive developments of any kind. That said, whether the record is highly (obliquely) "entertaining" and/or appreciable is really a whole different matter. Regarding the de-research of the "evil" (in music), I would assert [I reiterate that I have not listened to the record.. perhaps this is a monumental work, so you may be right] that by now, any sonic atrocity no longer has (assuming it ever did) the real capacity to represent "realities" that go beyond stylistic forms already widely abused and recycled to the point of nausea unless further extremizing (I believe there’s a limit to everything, in any case) concepts known to most. Cordial and warm (after all, it’s so cold..) regards. Your S.C. of (dis)trust.
Alfred Schnittke Chamber Music
Voto:
Dear de-reviewer Monsieur JohnOfPatmos, as usual (when will you decide to write a bad one?), it's a most pleasant de-reading that you have offered/proposed/gifted to us; quite frankly, not knowing anything about what you are discussing (as usual), I wouldn't really know what to de-comment (silence might perhaps be the "thing" to do.. ) on the de-encyclopedic treatise Schnittke-ian. The de-comment, I admit, is quite interesting (and not only "from" a merely musical standpoint) and enjoyable; I also wonder if the miserable destroyer of writing, like a decent portion of the recalcitrant debaser users (you, of course, cannot remedy the ignorance of others..) in the event of an auscultation, is able to fully appreciate/interact with materials (steep and thorny) of such caliber. Compliant saludos. Your trusted Sobillatore di (s)fiducia.
Morcheeba The Antidote
Voto:
Dear De-Punisher Mr. The Punisher, what are you saying? Am I actually offended?? And why on earth? Now I understand the reason why we often, let’s say willingly, don’t quite understand each other.. (and why you often, for no reason, passionately engage in colorful discourses and various epithets), perhaps we have a slightly divergent sense of humor: mine was merely meant to be a very simple (even poor) joke following your rhododendron de/comment.. nothing more, nothing less, I assure you. Best regards (as usual). Your trusted Scarrozzator di (s)fiducia.
Ozzy Osbourne Ozzmosis
Voto:
Dear de-reviewer Mademoiselle Crazy Train, in the face of the prosaic detractors... I have never listened to this de-commented album, as the kind de-commentator Mr. N.I.B.I.I.O, I would have "stopped" at the (really quite ugly) "No Rest..." album. I won't hide from you that in the past (mid-eighties: I was quite young then) I appreciated Ozzy as a solo artist: I still have a good memory of both "Bark At The Moon" and the subsequent "The Ultimate Sin"... and to be honest, I haven't dusted them off since then. The de-review is quite generous (to be benevolent...): a few snips here and there (and mind you, I'm someone who usually "overdoes it") wouldn't have hurt. Plenty of greetings. Your S.C. of (distrust).