sfascia carrozze

DeRank : 39,03
DeAge™ : 7567 days • Here since 25 september 2005
Laura Veirs Saltbreakers
Voto:
I hope you'll forgive me if I tend to disagree (not about the album and/or the artist, as I don't even know them) but on the para-negativizing concepts expressed in the opening review: let me explain myself better [it would be better to say, of course] by providing some vacuous examples along the way: a) "a half kiss given and not given": I ask, what about the delightful mix of sparkling emotions that such an intimate (though incomplete) gesture can evoke in those who "experience" it? b) "a blurry photo": look, I have taken/own quite a few... and I admit that, over time, those are the ones I scrutinize with greater attention/curiosity: the clear image tells everything already and doesn't require further scrutiny... that which is barely discernible holds within itself an irreproducible (chronological fragment) and magnetic allure. c) "the big cloud": lovely image just mentioned... but, I would dare to ask you, don't you think that such a cumulonimbus holds within itself a naturalistic strength and immense dignity capable of (even if only temporarily) overshadowing the universal stars? d) regarding "barolo": I'm sorry, but being almost exclusively a water-drinker, to me all exquisite wines taste like bottle cork. In short: am I or am I not your helpless can-opener (as well as wreckage) of trust? Ah yes, here we are (in "Berlin"). Perhaps.
Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck Le Vite Degli Altri
Voto:
I didn't do it. I'll go (maybe).
Vladimiro & Vladimiro Il dottor Stranamore
Voto:
Come on: you wouldn't (by any chance) want to come and tell me that the de-conflict of (possible/hypothetical) interests for you might represent a dilemma... I would add by way of example: I wouldn't know from your English parts, but from ours there’s someone who has (abundantly) governed us [and, even more seriously, without the slightest blink from those who should, at least institutionally, have raised a fuss] and has mostly profited as well as benefited from it, without giving it (or pretending not to give it) a second thought. So: there’s an urgent need for another appointment.
Alex Infascelli H2Odio
Voto:
@Monsieur Manliuzzo: exactly as you suppose.
Vladimiro & Vladimiro Il dottor Stranamore
Voto:
Can I appoint you [as the responsible person in second... actually, let’s make it third hand, shall we] urgently for both (sub)human cases? In any case (being intimately also a humanissimo case myself), I would lean more towards the thesis of the Ghost Nicholas rather than that of the disdainful de-reviewer (or presumed such) and recognized as a case-literary by now to the extreme. Civil regards and reconciliatory wishes.
Alex Infascelli H2Odio
Voto:
(In the disheveled de-reviews) Do exactly as if you were at home: you want to take off your scarfs, sprawl on the couch maybe with a wonderful and refreshing glass of healthy cold mint and then chat about this and that: just do it without any problem. The only courtesy I would dare to ask of you (and this is not the case) is to possibly not descend into gratuitous conflicts and vile vulgarity: for that, there's already plenty in the surrounding de-world (and not just the web). Thanks to todos los plurimos et assai cortesi de-intervenuti.
Manowar Gods Of War
Voto:
Death to False Metal!
Liquid Smoke Liquid Smoke
Voto:
I de-test vintage. Maybe it’s because I now “belong” to it? P.S. So I could potentially "...everything that was created omissis during the 1969-1970 season..." fall under Your de-preferences? Salamelecchi à sazietà.
Sam Peckinpah Cane Di Paglia
Voto:
OìcchèVvùsiete (the DePoeta Raineriqo would say) have you all come to an agreement (the de-Natoli & You)? I obey.
Sam Peckinpah Pat Garrett & Billy The Kid (1973)
Voto:
OìcchèVvùsiete (would say DePoeta Raineriqo) are you all in agreement? Respectfully.