sfascia carrozze

DeRank : 39,03
DeAge™ : 7565 days • Here since 25 september 2005
Charles Ebbets Lunch atop a skyscraper
Voto:
Dear (MicaTanto)Acquaintance of the web Azzo, the address to send (!) is always the same [which You know well]: Bolzano (commonly referred to as Bozen), Viale Venezia, 4: feel free to forward Your postcards, wax-sealed letters, registered mail, telegrams, bomb packages et similia with absolute trust. A warm greeting (without embrace).
Charles Ebbets Lunch atop a skyscraper
Voto:
Do you see, MadamaKosmo? Your initial reservations about the placement of such an imaginative DePagina are increasingly crumbling over time: it has now become one of the most viewed and "highly" frequented DePagine of the whole DeBasio from 15/18 to today. As for the Sacred Function concerning your Holy Union with the gentle boy, I must say, I would have liked (perhaps jokingly slapping your future groom with the excuse of the extreme Benedictio) but if I am indeed so unwelcome to lean even toward the SkeletroneNell'Armadione, let it be conducted by whom you deem most appropriate. But at least as a clerical beggar, may I participate?
Charles Ebbets Lunch atop a skyscraper
Voto:
@VostraTurkmenistanicità: You (s)quabble about me, poor and ragged. Well, yes, know (or if you click on the link - Octopus Paul - Germany vs. Spain that for this I will request the dearly unemployed Claudio your immediate DeBanning! Dioghà!
Charles Ebbets Lunch atop a skyscraper
Voto:
Enough! It's time to talk about serious things that can touch the most intimate strings and the deepest feelings of each one of us: [UH!]
Charles Ebbets Lunch atop a skyscraper
Voto:
Archdeacon Azzo, I see that you have (finally) arrived: I suspected [you] were sharp (Post #127 for the more distracted). But no. Moreover: doesn't even the friendly (and always virtual) hand squeeze me? Truly I am very sad and disappointed. Alas!
Charles Ebbets Lunch atop a skyscraper
Voto:
Brother Azzo, it seems to me that I see you tense; however, let me just add that I do not believe that Madam Igella DeKappa requires any defense attorney (even a qualified one) such as you have just positioned yourself as. But, and this leaves me moderately even more hesitant, is it possible that you have not understood the (non)sense of all this? In truth, I regret it a bit because I know you are much sharper, more adaptable, and more likable than what comes across from this your gratuitously lukewarm (technically insignificant) latest note. There is still time to remedy this. Or maybe not. A warm embrace.
Charles Ebbets Lunch atop a skyscraper
Voto:
UH! We were just missing the return of that old bumbling/roguish/grumbling Azzo with his empty, summer-evacuative conjectures! P.S. Good evening, handsome boy, it’s always a pleasure to know you’re here among these useless DeB-letteraristic parties. [ :P ]
Eminem Recovery
Voto:
Honestly, I do not agree with the harshest criticisms of the remarkable vocalist/artist Rì Anna. As long as we're talking about the performance of the average/mediocre Pinka, it can make sense, but Ri Hanna, no; because when Ri Anna raps, there really isn't anyone who can compete. Eh.
Charles Ebbets Lunch atop a skyscraper
Voto:
I believe I haven't (ever) had a quarrel with anyone on DeBasero, or at least I hope so. If otherwise, please let me know because I honestly hadn't noticed at all. Kappa, what would it mean to excessively/incrementally increase the visits of this lecteraristica DePagina with a bit of healthy DeGossip regarding the DeBasio: but is it true what Bartolo claims, namely that "recent events have made you 'ill-disposed' towards someone"? And, if so, who would this "someone" be? Thus, I take the initiative and become the first signatory of the C.P.U.D.C.L.I.P.S.P.I.C. (s.f.p.d.) [Committee for a DeBaser that washes its dirty laundry at CasaPagina] (so to speak).
Charles Ebbets Lunch atop a skyscraper
Voto:
Anyway, to hopefully close the discussion on the supposed "handicap on visibility" predicted by Madamigella Kosmologika on the DePagina of the esteemed Enbar77, the access data speaks clearly: in just three days, 637 visits and more than seventy comments (including, of course, the clarifying/multiple ones from the courteous editors discussing) literally sweep away any debate regarding the possible “""""inferiority""""” under any angle one might want to interpret of the beloved section DeCasistica. And now everyone to the bar, as I’m treating you to an appetizer. For me, Aqua, though. Au revoirre.