The Punisher

DeRank : 1,08 • DeAge™ : 7252 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 23 september 2005
Voto:
"Even doping up to the unbelievable level, any Punisher wouldn't come close to the sublime apparent stupidity of 'Girlfriend in a Coma'... Mr. Nobody, sorry if I don't understand, but could you explain yourself better in words of a NORMAL person or at least SANE MIND? What does this sentence mean? that I wanted to get close TO WHAT? ME? get close in what sense, what would you like to compare me to? The Smiths? Are you crazy to say such nonsense? The stale exercise you're talking about DOES NOT GIVE YOU permission to read me for no reason: I repeat, by my choice, I decided TO CRITICIZE or 'punish' (which indeed sounds a bit childish and that's fine) the works that I don't consider, for various reasons that I generally explain, up to the name of the singer, the band, the undeserved success and so on. Ah... I must introduce you to a certain wrecking car, I believe you would get along famously!"
Voto:
Since there's a lot of f*** around, as Emanuel says, I have an idea to propose to the Succhiadanè Committee that manages Vasco. Check this out: a pubic hair of the singer in every packaging along with the umpteenth Live attached. Title: "A HAIR OF LIVE."
Hipsters and fags would buy it in droves, right? (Oh God, what have I said, someone would actually think of doing it JUST TO SELL something else!)
Voto:
Massimof,
My review will say things VERY different from this, framing this Christmas panettone from another perspective. If you have the patience to wait, you will read SOMETHING ELSE compared to this.
If you want to read it, fine; if not, amen.
Nothing more, nothing less.
Voto:
I will do it... thanks for the tip.
Voto:
I "review" Vasco, so to speak... Vasco hasn’t said anything to me for a long time and I’ll say it as soon as my "pseudo-review" comes out... I review what I want and what I think I can do better, with all the limitations that come with it... I don't know Tool well, so I'll abstain... what the hell should I do?! Tell me, since you feel so sorry for me, you little brat...
Voto:
Sorry superintruder, but I don't know Tool very well and generally I don't get involved with nu-metal music or whatever the hell they're called: I leave that to the pale, pimple-faced kids dressed in boots even in summer, with piercings in their tongues, who know more about it than I do...
Voto:
Come on, you junkyard, don't get involved too... you who usually flies so high, you fall like this?!
Voto:
Charro carriages disassembler, don't take offense if I send you AFANCUULOH? No?
Well then, VA-FFF-ANC-HUL-LO!!
(And if you can tell me how many mistakes there are, I’ll send you the golden mongolino at my expense: I swear!)
Voto:
Sorry Marietto, but I don't think so. This, rightly so, is considered the group's misstep and the reasons are all there. When it came out in '87 I was there, and like many, I was disappointed by the sounds, the songs, and the soft atmosphere that was in the air. I don't have the obsession, as you say, of finding the missteps of bands... the missteps are there, and the albums are there to testify to it.
Voto:
Be careful: I absolutely love the Smiths, but I don't hold back when they slip up and I will speak out... in Art, there are no Gods or Untouchables; if you have a valid reason, you can speak ill of the Beatles too. Even if the reason is known only to you. Let's put an end to this hypocrisy...
Similar users
!oasis

DeRank: 0,49

$face$

DeRank: 0,00

(!)

DeRank: 0,29

rabideyes

DeRank: 0,00

Tags 3/3
# #1 #36
Groups