michi

DeRank : 0,37
DeAge™ : 7598 days • Here since 21 august 2005
883 Hanno ucciso l'uomo ragno
Voto:
I still don't know if you’re a genius or a complete fool; I need to study you more... in any case, a nice four for encouragement! the album sucks ass.
Captain Beefheart and His Magic Band Trout Mask Replica
Voto:
At first, it leaves you a bit disappointed, but then you realize it's a masterpiece. It's not my favorite album, though; I don't agree with Scaruffi, but it's still worth a listen. The availability of the album isn't easy if you go to those stores where there's nothing, but in import shops, you can find plenty of copies.
Captain Beefheart and His Magic Band Trout Mask Replica
Voto:
beautiful, beautiful, beautiful. The album is essential; without it, you know nothing about music: it's one of those must-haves that, implicitly or explicitly, have made contemporary history.
Las Ketchup Hijas del Tomate
Voto:
Are you an idiot? Sorry for the rudeness, but do you really think it's worth your time to review three incompetent scorfani? You disappoint me a lot because I've always considered you the best reviewer on deBaser, alongside the great Cleo. Come on!!! Keep talking about great albums like only you know how to do instead of bringing out this nonsense!!!!! A nice one for the pay! ;D
The Velvet Underground The Velvet Underground & Nico
Voto:
I really liked it, josi_, the "plastic" disc image... in my opinion, it perfectly reflects the soul of the album. ;D
The Velvet Underground The Velvet Underground & Nico
Voto:
Joe, I repeat that your review is beautiful and I congratulate you. However, looking at it from another angle, namely that you actually WANTED to write a review rich in dates and lacking in sentiment, one can see things turning upside down, in my opinion. Personally, I believe I have managed to create both good reviews that contained solely my emotional judgment, which I certainly consider the most valid, and equally good reviews in which I was able to mix both aspects evenly (see Aqualung). Judging myself, I must conclude that your review is indeed beautiful for being poor in information and exquisitely naive, but if your intent was to blend the text with precise and detailed information, then I must acknowledge that you did a mediocre and poorly executed job. In my opinion, I should give you a new and lower rating, but I won’t do it because your work is still beautiful, and it’s a pity that the author did not grasp the beauty of their own work. In return, another nice 5 to the legends.
Pink Floyd The Final Cut
Voto:
Kylie Minogue Impossible Princess
Voto:
ah, how I love her... she, along with Stefani, has managed to make decent records (and for this genre of music, the judgment "decent" is a luxury that few can afford), even within an infinitely commercial scope. I might be talking nonsense here, but when I hear her mewling, I vainly remember Fraser's angelic little voice... nonsense, yes, I admit it! ;D
Anyway, she is a valid artist whom I love especially for her work with Cave... A big thumbs up to both of them (nice review)!
The Velvet Underground The Velvet Underground & Nico
Voto:
But don’t you understand that writing reviews is also a work of art? It’s the art of advertising to readers what has moved and touched us, and what do dates, places, names have to do with it? If it were up to me, I wouldn’t even mention the album’s author or the date, nor the title unless it was obviously necessary for the purchase. But don’t you get that our job, yours and mine as reviewers, is to express the soul, the heart of the work, and who cares about the date or the birthplace of this or that singer? Of course, one gets passionate and ends up learning about their "hero," their "favorite"... but informing is not our job, in my opinion...