Bartleboom

DeRank : 35,89
DeAge™ : 7621 days • Here since 9 august 2005
Vittorio De Sica Sciuscià
Voto:
@IoTinsulto: I swear I don't know who you are (maybe you're one of those I get along with best!:DDD!), but forgive me, as a fake you're really terrible!! The true fake never argues with their victims, especially in just one review and after so little time in action! The true fake takes it from afar, throwing out some annoying insults every now and then, some stupid comments, ruining averages with idiotic reasons. And then the true fake doesn't fixate on just one user.. the true fake is a joker in every sense and, as such, mocks everything and everyone! Bye!
Vittorio De Sica Sciuscià
Voto:
@supersoul: I need to understand!! :DD! The introduction-definition that good Poletti gives of neorealism is peaceful and shareable or not?!?.. From Purpulan's post, it would seem not..
Vittorio De Sica Sciuscià
Voto:
@Purpu: let's try to talk a bit about cinema, okay... Can you give me 5 essential titles not to understand, but rather to approach neorealism?! Thank you so much...
Vittorio De Sica Sciuscià
Voto:
Personally, I (almost) agree with everyone: @Poletti: because he wrote a review that is very enjoyable to read, providing a lot of information for those who have never really dabbled in this cinematic genre (like myself..), but it also shows passion. @Bubi: when he says that Colossal would do better to tell us where this review was copied from, instead of throwing the stone and drawing back the hand. @purpulan: who reminded me of a really mischievous joke (I'm sorry, Bubi, but I believe you misunderstood..). Hi everyone!
Joss Stone Molto simile a Back Stubber degli O'Jays
Voto:
..it cracks me up that you didn’t even write "arrangiamento" in full!!:DDD! Very good_! By the way, how gorgeous is Stone in that photo!
Forbidden Distortion
Voto:
I read the review. Really well written: a merciless critique of an album that, at the time, also disappointed me quite a bit. Years later, with a few more "open" listens under my belt, I can say that there is something good in it and, above all, that it took a lot of courage to make such a bold turn.
Forbidden Distortion
Voto:
@telespalla:..just yesterday I was struck by the beauty of your writing in literary cases, but now I am at least baffled by your comment! Forgive me, but: 1) Forbidden have always distinguished themselves in the thrash scene not only from a purely technical standpoint but also for the quality of their compositions: I don’t know if they ever fancied themselves "great musicians," but they certainly knew how to do their job well. 2) "sooner or later everyone goes experimental".. forgive me, but.. "everyone" who?!? and, above all, "black album experimental"?!?
High On Fire Death Is This Communion
Voto:
Only recently have I had time to give it a listen, so let's say my opinion is just that... risking blasphemy, I say: beautiful, mind you, ignorant, angrier than a Taliban at the Misex, etc. etc... But I wanted it to be more decayed, more sick, more "annoying"... in short: "The Art.." is still giving blow jobs to the witches. Then maybe in a week I'll come back here and give it only five... who knows!
Forbidden Distortion
Voto:
I don’t have time to read it, but I want to state right away that I disagree with the vote. Above all, though, there's something I’m keen to understand: lately, I’ve been seeing the tracklist of the album included in the reviews more and more often... BUT WHY?!?!... especially when doing a track by track, and if, as in this case, you can just check the site’s archive to know which songs are on the album! Talk later! Bye!
Arab Strap Ten Years of Tears
Voto:
..splendid..